Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kiltie65; Yaelle; nascarnation; All
On further research, the phrase "continuously physically present" does not mean what it says.

From IN THE MATTER OF M, 7 IN Dec. 646 (B.I.A. 1958) ...

Following the present view, in order to retain his United States citizenship and in accordance with the provisions of section 301 (b) and (c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, applicant was required to come to the United States prior to his attainment of the age of 23 years and immediately following any such coming to be continuously physically present in the United States for at least 5 years, which physical presence period must follow the attainment of the age of 14 years and precede the age of 28 years. Applicant came to the United States on May 10, 1952, at which time he was 17 years of age, and has been actually physically present in the United States continuously since that date except for the period of 26 days when he went to Mexico to get an immigrant visa in July 1956. His absence of 26 days in July 1956 did not break the continuity of his physical presence, in view of section 16 of P.L. 85-316 approved September 11, 1957, which provides:

In the administration of section 301 (b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, absences from the United States of less than twelve months in the aggregate, during the period for which continuous physical presence in the United States is required, shall not be considered to break the continuity of such physical presence.

Therefore on May 10, 1957, applicant had completed 5 years' continuous physical presence in the United States and had fulfilled the retention requirements of section 301 (b) and (c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. His application for a certificate of citizenship will be granted.

Apologies for the false alarm, unless of course, Congress has changed its mind on THAT aspect too!

Fairly complex interplay between the 1934 and 1952 Naturalization Act, relating to physically presence of the "new" citizen (not presence of the US-citizen parent, but US presence subsequent to birth). many people had citizenship, lost it, then got it back - all automatically by operation of law, combined with their life experiences, where they lived.

356 posted on 02/13/2016 11:59:01 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Ok, that is what I thought. You can travel away from your residence for short visits.


377 posted on 02/13/2016 12:17:28 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson