What seems to have disappeared from the reporting is the fact that just setting up the server to handle ANY government business was in strict violation of the law.
I’d like to hear some of our ersatz conservative congressmen and pithy pundits point that out more often (or how about even mentioning it once?)
Really. Soooo.....she explicitly had the the server set up to evade oversight or scrutiny, it demonstrably held a substantial amount of sensitive and/or classified information, she demonstrably knew about it and ordered her subordinates to hide that fact....why hasn't she been indicted? Why hasn't anyone been indicted?
This is outrageously worse than Watergate, a thousand thousand times worse. It's so frustrating for all the dots to come out and be connected and yet the gov't mysteriously has it's collective head in the sand with respect to the obvious.
Frankly the fact that Congress refuses to impeach any officer of the Obama Administration or Obama himself over the continued refusal of the Justice Department to come to any obvious conclusion is very telling. It only promotes the conclusion that the federal government has been captured by a criminal organization.
If the Republican party is not willing to storm the barricades on this subject alone the implications are obvious (an exercise best left for the reader, given the ubiquitous surveillance posture of the nanny state).