To: Elyse
What crap blaming Bush for 9/11?! Do Trump supporters agree that there weren’t weapons of mass destruction?This line of argument by Trump loses me big time. I'll still support him, but I think I could do without it. I mean, you can say, AS I HAVE, that perhaps the Stability of a Saddam would have been better, but to make the claim that "they knew" there were no WMD, that's b*llsh*t.
591 posted on
02/13/2016 6:36:43 PM PST by
Paradox
(Can't wait for stupid season to end.)
To: Paradox
Trump always uses liberal talking points.
Gee, I wonder why.
628 posted on
02/13/2016 6:38:28 PM PST by
Fundamentally Fair
(Is that just what you have written on your "What Trump Means to Me" chalkboard?)
To: Paradox
I believe that Saddam either had weapons of mass destruction or his scientists and underlings faked to him that they had them. Saddam was paying for them. His underlings were ripping him off royally, as were the European weapons manufactures and traders. I knew some of their women in Switzerland. They had more money than they could spend.
651 posted on
02/13/2016 6:39:12 PM PST by
Yaelle
To: Paradox
Trump was really out of line on the WMD. anyone with half a brain saw those semis going over the border into syria after picking up those weapons.
Trump is really burying himself tonight.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson