Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Someone can’t retire too soon, nor get too much out of his exercise equipment...
89 posted on
02/13/2016 7:57:35 PM PST by
null and void
(This war starts in the spiritual realm-it will end in ours though.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
92 posted on
02/13/2016 7:59:04 PM PST by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittancez)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is too close to the Presidential election, and with it being Scalia’s seat, not another liberal’s, in a 5-4 “conservative majority” (often doesn’t seem like it), this will be too much of a fight going on at the same time as the election.
Those two battles, and the Clinton email investigation as well, in which it’s obvious to everyone but diehard Democrats she isn’t qualified to handle classified information.
To have all that going on may force the Dems to not nominate someone, or else not fight for the person.
93 posted on
02/13/2016 7:59:05 PM PST by
Faith Presses On
(Make this Unborn Children and "The Center for Medical Progress" Awareness Week)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not to worry Hairy, the Republican members of the Uni-party will do the right thing and confirm anyone the boy king nominates.
Please Hairy, remember any opposition voiced is just for the consumption of the rabble back home.
94 posted on
02/13/2016 7:59:22 PM PST by
Tupelo
(Honest men go to Washington, but honest men do not stay in Washington.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Or what? You’ll send your exercise equipment to beat us up?
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hey Dingy! Bite me you commie *****!
100 posted on
02/13/2016 8:11:20 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Basement Dwellers for Bernie 2016)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Harry can bite me. . . . .
101 posted on
02/13/2016 8:12:36 PM PST by
Godzilla
(3/7/77)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
So I guess Reid and the Rats will block all appropriations to force a Senate vote on SCJ. Gov’t shutdown Oct 1. ... Start storing the beans and rice ...
102 posted on
02/13/2016 8:14:57 PM PST by
11th_VA
(It's all gonna change once Trump's president)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
103 posted on
02/13/2016 8:17:14 PM PST by
yoe
To: 2ndDivisionVet
105 posted on
02/13/2016 8:21:16 PM PST by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
106 posted on
02/13/2016 8:23:10 PM PST by
mongo141
(Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I want to punch him in the face and I am a GIRL.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is way too big an opportunity for the progressives.
They will do anything and everything necessary to replace Scalia with one of their own. They will push through exactly who they want; they will lie, cheat, break the law, ignore the Constitution, anything, no matter how evil it is. The media too will lie, suppress, ridicule, disparage, anything they need to do to turn the court their way. With the exception of two or three lone voices, republicans will do absolutely nothing to stop them and will even help them.
We will have an extreme leftist on the SCOTUS before the November election. I'm absolutely convinced of it. Nothing in recent history suggests anything but that outcome.
The United States is no longer united. America is a different place now. That's reality.
108 posted on
02/13/2016 8:24:14 PM PST by
Bronzewound
(2016 GOP. A Timid Little Division Of The Democrat Party.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If Ginsburg retires - and I think she will - that will put real pressure on the GOP to fill at least one of the two openings, but they should still stick with one of the two. That would give Obama three appointments to the court during his term, which is certainly enough. It might be a rallying point for the Dems in this election cycle, but I just can't see a majority of Americans getting fired up about this. I think enough Americans hate Obama that the GOP can come out relatively unscathed.
110 posted on
02/13/2016 8:27:26 PM PST by
Major Matt Mason
(Those that can, do, those that can't, work in the Beltway.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If the situation were reversed, he would have said “any nomination is dead on arrival.”
The republicans better get a set.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I think we need to block that!!!
To: 2ndDivisionVet
His Twitter profile picture:
115 posted on
02/13/2016 8:58:47 PM PST by
Faith Presses On
(Make this Unborn Children and "The Center for Medical Progress" Awareness Week)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Yeah well, we won Harry.
Get over it.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Here’s predicting that the open borders elites in both parties have already come up with someone that will, on the surface, appear to be conservative - but is wholly committed to the open borders cause. Obola will magnanimously nominate this “conservative” (to maintain the court’s balance, dontcha know) and there won’t be enough true American votes to stop them.
I hate to say this, but this country is now completely screwed.
117 posted on
02/13/2016 9:34:06 PM PST by
Some Fat Guy in L.A.
(Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite it's unfashionability)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
See you at the revolution Harry........
119 posted on
02/13/2016 11:39:42 PM PST by
Envisioning
(4.13.15 - That awkward moment in history when 53 million racists became sexists...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson