One FReeper has already questioned this. Regarding talk of an Obama recess appointment, it seems to be up to the Senate to decide when it is in recess, corrections welcome.
My concern is that the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification, RINO-controlled Senate will try to play any constitutional excuse to not take responsibility for confirming an Obama-nominated replacement for Justice Scalio (RIP).
Getting back to recess appointments, again, it looks like it is up to the Senate to decide recesses. And if such is the case, it is also beginning to look like the Senate does not have any solid constitutional loopholes to use as an excuse to ”abdicate” its constitutional responsibility for confirming justices. Again, corrections welcome.
I am sooooo happy that this is an election year. The Senate appears to be between ”a rock and a hard place,” with respect to confirming an Obama-nominated justice, Obama on one side, and patriots very angry at corrupt Congress for protecting lawless Obama for the last 7+ years on the other side.
Remember in November !
> My concern is that the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification, RINO-controlled Senate will try to play any constitutional excuse to not take responsibility for confirming an Obama-nominated replacement for Justice Scalio (RIP).
Count on it.