Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jessduntno

Yes I know that, that’s why my comment about the Feds wanting Apple to circumvent the screen lock so they can brute force it with codes.

What’s your point? Should us mere humans not have the ability for our phones to self destruct after 10 tries? Or should Apple be forced to disable that based on a court order? If we can command a company to make their private property and inventions a certain way why not take that further? Mane the next election cycle we can push further?

This is why Apple needs to continue to make it impossible for them to help. It’s not their job to make their software Fed friendly. Build a nearly inaccessible device period.


270 posted on 02/21/2016 8:12:12 PM PST by light-bulb (Plures efficimur quotiens metimur a vobis; semen est sanguis Christianorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]


To: light-bulb

“What’s your point? Should us mere humans not have the ability for our phones to self destruct after 10 tries?”

No.

“This is why Apple needs to continue to make it impossible for them to help. It’s not their job to make their software Fed friendly. Build a nearly inaccessible device period.”

I don’t need Apple to protect mr from my government.


271 posted on 02/21/2016 8:13:58 PM PST by jessduntno (Steady, Reliable, and (for now) Republican - Donald Trump, (D, R, I, D, R, I, R - NY) /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson