You can't prove anything, either. I don't intend to play this game.
I initially replied because I think it's pretty low to accuse a man of homosexual relations without any actual soloid proof. The man has children and this is unnecessary.
I certainly don't intend to stand up and jump through hoops to defend a man that I don't care for and I don't support but I've not stood by and I can live with that. I'm done with this.
Good evening.
So I'm asking you to prove what you say.
You can't prove anything, either. I don't intend to play this game.I initially replied because I think it's pretty low to accuse a man of homosexual relations without any actual solid proof. The man has children and this is unnecessary.
Umm, of course I can't prove anything without evidence. Hence the "speculation" of this obviously questionable evidence.
And what's this game you mention? There's no game here. You stepped into the middle of someone else's conversation and speculation with some weird moral authority at the ready and assigning of motives. I asked you to back up your clear statement ...
I saw the photo weeks ago, and even blown up - no, it's not his ear.
... now if you can't do that then fine, just say so. If it in fact your alleged evidence exists, then please find it and give me a link. Don't try to wiggle out of your comment now under cover of moral indignation. Furthermore, it's a bit ironic Irenic that you, who is upset at speculation here, comes here and speculates on the motives of others. Jeez Louise.
For the record, I have no clue if the anchor baby is a poofter, but the chance is clearly greater than 50/50 in my opinion. Establishing the mere possibility that he is in that mess of foam of topless men does not even make him a 'mo, but just another data point to consider. It's nothing more than interesting forensic analysis over an old photograph at this point in time.
Finally, how about you do me a favor and think what *you* want, and let other's think what they want, mmmkay? Don't be a busy body ( bet you heard that suggestion more than a few times, eh ;-)