Replies

The problem with your explanation is that a number of us are scientists or engineers and used to testing a "black box" to see how it works. If, regardless of input, you get the same output, then it has some pretty bizarre filters.

For instance, I voted the extreme liberal ticket, and to my surprise Bernie came out on top. But Bernie is not a liberal, he is a radical. Furthermore, Trump still came out in the middle, and the bottom who should have been Cruz was now Jim Gilmore.

Bernie Sanders 91%
Hillary Clinton 80%
Jim Webb 61%
Ben Carson 34%
Donald Trump 33%
John Kasich 32%
Ted Cruz 23%
Marco Rubio 20%
Jeb Bush 19%
Jim Gilmore 14%

So Trump is a better anti-liberal than he is a conservative, and Jeb and Marco are better anti-liberals than Cruz.

It's utter meaningless blather.

Why wouldn't you just answer according to your true beliefs and weigh the answers as to the importance you attach to them and then accept that if you are staunch constitutionalist Cruz will most closely match your beliefs?

Your results when you took the survey as a raving liberal had Sanders on top which would seem to validate the survey. Of course I don't know if you weighted the answers which would affect the results. But this is not a push poll.