Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Support whoever you want, but when you start implying that my guy will cost folks their health, I think it’s reasoned for me to state my guy won’t.

There's our problem right there.

How then can I promote my own candidate's policies without it being taken as disparaging your's?

I do have a real problem with a campaign consisting solely of personal attacks when there are really, really important issues at stake. That was my point.

67 posted on 02/23/2016 3:00:41 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: skeeter

Did I address your candidate?

I merely said that I am very happy with my candidate’s position.

I think that is a reasoned way to address an implication without making a personal attack.

You didn’t. I didn’t.

Mine was a completely positive response.

I didn’t infer another candidate would cost someone their health without mentioning their name.

Do you really think my comments were inappropriate in response?


77 posted on 02/23/2016 3:14:30 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson