Posted on 02/24/2016 2:39:57 PM PST by Mariner
No executive experience.
Why?
I think Newt’s highest and best use is as an advisor.
Forty-six percent of the Latino vote in a Republican primary.
Mark Cuban
A minus was he opused out taking shots at Trump.
Why don't you like him?
Aside from signing legislation that went against the unions and surviving a recall Walker does not seem like presidential material to me.
Walker is not able to articulate a clear vision for America, he appears to have no real agenda for solving the myriad of problems, he’s soft on amnesty,and he encouraged every legislator to vote for TPA. The guy does not even have a college degree and he wants to be the leader of the Free World. In short he’s another 25 year career establishment politician.
My original statement about Scott Walker still stands. “Out of 330 million people in the USA is Scott Walker the best we can do for President?”
Rudy gets him NY & NJ in the general. Plus he’s a close friend, would be loyal, knows gov’t & the law inside & out and would make a great VP. Trump already has the South & Middle America locked up. To hell with the Left coast.
I predict nobody establishment, but he did say someone who is politically experienced.
Newt Gingrich is the last politician in recent memory to do anything on behalf of the American people..I wish/hope Trump considers him for VP..what a team.
What is a ‘born again’ Christian ? Christ said only those that are born from above pass the first test to see the kingdom of God... There are some called the fallen angels that refused to take this flesh journey and they have, along with the devil, been judged to death... Born again is a tradition of man NOT of Christ....
AND it was NOT Trump who hinted, suggested Scot Brown for Veep.... What happened to ‘a time for truth’?
Thank you.
Trump - Sessions ‘16!
aha, ok. i did not know that.
anyone like rice but more acceptable that you know of?
I’d like a younger version of Jeff Sessions. No names come to mind, though. I don’t care if it’s a woman or a man, but absolutely NOT Condoleezza Rice!
I think I understand you, if I fold in other comments received here. OK, I concede that Condoleezza could be significantly problematic, possibly enough to preclude her from consideration. I highly doubt she would be willing to change her political spots for anything or anyone (including VP-ship under Trump). It would probably not be recommended to trust any promises she would make under those conditions, and yes I am thinking the JFK-LBJ “successor” model.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.