Posted on 03/01/2016 6:54:15 AM PST by OPS4
I don’t mind that he agrees with Trump on that issue. So do I. I just don’t see that the statement is an endorsement of Trump’s candidacy. That I would not agree with.
How many pieces of silver Franklin?
Hugely disappointing.
Didn't Obama meet with the parents of black thugs...
Didn't Obama meet with the parents of black thugs... and the parents of deserters?
I beg to differ. I just voted for Trump and I have respect for evangelicals. I am a Christian who voted for Trump. I suppose you're going to now tell me I'm not a true Christian?
What part is the lie? I didn’t say you didn’t love Graham or Trump. I’m just pointing out the disparity of the world views. That’s not a lie, and I challenge you to prove that it is.
Learn what “tend” to be means. I’m speaking as a group, not as individuals.
So you can insult a group and not insult an individual of that group. It depends on what the meaning of “tend” is. Got it.
You are very twisted. You said those who support Trump dispise Graham. I called it a lie and there is no further point wasting my time on a blantant lie by you.
And I’ll say it again: Trump’s supporters TEND to be libertarian types and liberals. I stand by that. If you’re not in that group, good for you.
Don’t get sucked in by the deception. This article is at least a half-year old and was only posted here by a Freeper who apparently wants us to believe that Graham endorsed Trump. A dirty trick, right here on FR, and unless you look closely at the details you won’t know - which is why this kind of crap gets done.
It’s probably why a “news” crew posted a report of Marco Rubio disparaging the Bible, claiming to be eyewitnesses of what Rubio said, which was later found not to be what he said when the same people who made the “eyewitness report” with the video footage gave Rubio’s team a “clearer” version of the audio with which he disproved the “news report” claim. The people who made the “news report” had the clearer audio the whole time and still posted the report, which was believed because of their eyewitness claim. Of course, it was done to frame the Cruz campaign, which once again called attention to a media report and got blasted for “dirty tricks” for it.
Anybody who got sucked in by this Freeper’s posting today is just as “dirty” as the Cruz campaign was when they got suckered by deceptive reports designed to destroy Cruz’s reputation. If you were one of the candidates, what just happened - with you suspecting Graham of endorsing Trump - would be heralded in all the other campaigns and in the news as evidence of your “dirty tricks”. Welcome to Cruz’s world.
So when did Donald copy Cruz’s plan? Pathetic.
This was published on July 16, 2015.
This has nothing to do with any kind of endorsement.
Old news. Saeed Abedini has been freed for a while.
LOL! The type of people who back Trump tend to be the exact same people who despise Evangelicals like Graham.
—
Way off.
Not a presidential endorsement of Trump and Abedini is already out. This is old
Okay. But let’s call it about as close to an endorsement as he’ll likely give.
Yes, he was. And most of the "comments" on this article at the source were posted back in 2015, so the article isn't even close to being a current item. Also, the content posted appears to have been edited and enhanced from the statement that was actually released by Franklin Graham. The article as posted should be taken with a grain (or maybe even a pillar) of salt.
You really should find better sources of information. That was very misleading.
So what? Nobody said he did?
But thank you for posting his very supportive words about our next president Donald J Trump
He didn’t say anything about Ted Cruz beating his wife... wait or was that O’Reily?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.