Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

I wouldn’t disagree with the families, but beyond that, terrorist are just flapping in the wind.

Even if the Geneva Convention were an iron-clad agreement to protect terrorists, if I were president I would ignore it.

If a guy can walk up beside me without waring on a public street and stab me to death, I don’t care what the Geneva Convention says or doesn’t say. It’s preposterous on the face of it.

If a terrorist may have information leading to the prevention of a weapon of mass destruction going off in a highly populated area, you can bet your hind end the GC would be the last thing on my or any other sane person.

I believe that Trump was expressing the same frustration we all do. I do not expect him to break international law on a whim. If it comes down to your or my families lives, I hope he does.


37 posted on 03/04/2016 2:34:27 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
Please READ what I posted.

The GC is an iron-clad agreement to protect terrorists IF you have ratified Protocol II. We have never ratified Protocol II.

55 posted on 03/04/2016 3:30:47 PM PST by FredZarguna (Billy was a simple country boy. You might say a cockeyed optimist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson