Sorry, but you phrased your comment as a statement of fact, when it is anything but a fact. And that statement has been repeated over and over again by Trump supporters, even though it has been debunked repeatedly. So yes, I tend to assume that anyone continuing to repeat a statement proven to be false is lying. If you were unaware of the truth, then I offer my apologies, and expect that you will not make the same factual error in the future...
I fail to see where their positions are any better than Trump’s stand which is that he would only approve funding for PP if they consented to removing abortions from the services they are rendering.
There is absolutely no reason for any federal funds to go to PP, whether or not they continue to do abortions. PP started out as a eugenics project by Margaret Sanger, designed to help reduce the population of the "lesser races". Now, along with abortion its primary purpose is to speed the sexualization of our children and encourage promiscuity, teaching them about masturbation, homosexuality, and teaching them that they should not involve their parents in discussions about their lives. Every actual health service provided by PP can be provided better, cheaper and to a wider range of patients by federally-qualified health care centers. So the fact that Trump supports ANY continued taxpayer funds going to PP makes his position much less desirable than Cruz or Rubio.
Except for the fact that TRUMP is a heck of a lot more desirable that Cruz or RUBIO so I would think that’s a plus.