Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

“That is the point why would any of them lower their price.”

Because, as I said, they would undercut everyone who isn’t and put all of their competition out of business.

“The stockholders would have none of it.”

You think stockholders would balk at increasing their market share to 100%?!?

“I will will start a manufacturing company when you loan me 50 million.”

Ok, forget we are talking about you then. Why hasn’t anybody done this, then? Why wouldn’t a single company take advantage of such a ripe opportunity to liquidate all of their competition?


99 posted on 03/07/2016 1:19:55 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
Just how much do you think labor represents of the cost of a manufactured good?

On average labor is about 8% of the retail price, and that is the high end for union labor.

These companies are increasing their profit bottom lines, they wouldn't do it to keep the same profit level. I would be pointless.

103 posted on 03/07/2016 1:53:37 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson