Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: more

Makaeff’s attorneys say Trump’s argument that their client is indispensable to the billionaire’s defense “is illogical to the point of being nearly incomprehensible.” They note the judge allowed two plaintiffs to withdraw last year; three others would remain.


2 posted on 03/09/2016 5:16:34 AM PST by McGruff (Trump should sue the Republican Party for Breach of Contract.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: McGruff

Read somewhere that the law firm (who deals primarily with class action cases). Actually recruited some of the plaintiffs.


4 posted on 03/09/2016 5:19:06 AM PST by hoosiermama (Make America Great Again by uniting Great Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff

In all honesty, and taking nothing away from the veracity of Trump’s case, I wonder if they’ve realised (or more likely, their attorneys are realising) that they’d be in way over their heads dealing with a man who is potentially going to be President of the US. I know he’s only supposed to be the “First Citizen” and not immune to the law (saying nothing about this case, about which I know little to nothing), but that hasn’t been the case for generations, or at least since Nixon, and in that case, people much more powerful than these people were dealing with Nixon, including the all-powerful and at that time nearly monolithic leftist media.


5 posted on 03/09/2016 5:24:43 AM PST by mrsmel (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson