Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always A Marine; LSUfan

I agree with LSUfan that withholding support for a good law because of its name is intellectually lazy. Furthermore, I think defending your assertion by calling a law that punishes support for terrorism at the state level an “incremental increases of government power” is intellectually crippled, especially in light of or central government’s reluctance to recognize, much less aggressively prosecute, those who promote and support Islamic jihad. There is no more proper role of government than prosecuting Islamic terror when the federal government systematically refused to do it.


6 posted on 03/12/2016 7:43:47 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: elfman2
There are no criminal components of "terrorism" that are not already punishable as existing crimes, so why is there a rush for new laws to combat terrorism? I would urge extreme caution over such new laws, and ask Freepers to consider not just who are the terorists today - but who might be labeled "terrorists" tomorrow. Naming laws after sympathetic victims is camouflage and cover from rational scrutiny. Stop feeling and think!

The current scare over "terrorism" in our "homeland" is a useful tool of tyrants in waiting. If this were not so, we would simply deport dangerous foreigners and stop admitting new ones. That could be done in a month, but is not even discussed. Why not? Rather than correct the problem we are intentionally creating, we are building the framework for a police state that threatens the freedom of American citizens whom it purports to protect.

7 posted on 03/12/2016 2:23:58 PM PST by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson