Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

Patton saw the need for a tank to accompany infantry, not necessarily to fight other tanks.
Some of the Sherman crews called their tanks `Ronsons’. Those were brave guys.


49 posted on 03/13/2016 7:42:43 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: tumblindice

The Japs had there flaming Zeros and we had our flaming Shermans. Nothing noble about either sitution. We were too stubborn to halt production and make a better tank. The Japs had a better plane in the A-7 but refused to cut over.


50 posted on 03/13/2016 7:46:29 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: tumblindice

American tactical armored doctrine at the beginning of WWII was tanks supported infantry. Anti-Tank responsibility was that of the anti-tank Battalions. This doctrine underwent a lot of modification during the war. The British referred to their Sherman tanks as “Tommy Cookers”.


53 posted on 03/13/2016 8:04:05 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson