Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kathsua

Me too. I’m sure the patient was old how risky this would be. Good thing they reacted quickly and took it out. With transplants, sometimes they take, other times they continue to be rejected by the body’s immune system. I recall when heart transplants were becoming more common. Back in the 60’s. It took decades of actual empirical experience before the procedure became more predictable and thus safer to attempt.

I think even after uterus transplants have become safer and more routine, there will be unpredictable consequences. The baby born in such a transplanted uterus may have a mixture of DNA from the uterus donor and the birth mother, along, of course with any DNA of the father.
Does this speculation make sense to those of you trained in medicine? As you may have guessed, I am not trained in such procedures at all.


2 posted on 03/14/2016 9:31:19 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lee martell

What is wrong with adopting?


3 posted on 03/14/2016 9:39:10 PM PDT by waterhill (I Shall Remain, in spite of __________.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: lee martell

The maternal DNA comes from the mother’s egg, which comes from her ovary, not from the uterus.


4 posted on 03/14/2016 9:40:24 PM PDT by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson