Posted on 03/20/2016 5:16:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
On Friday at the South by Southwest Festival in Austin, President Obama said: “We’re the only advanced democracy in the world that makes it harder for people to vote.
“It’s sad,” he said. “We take enormous pride that we're the oldest contingent democracy, but we systematically put up barriers and make it as hard as possible for our citizens to vote.”
But how hard is it to vote? President Obama told SXSW it is “much easier to order pizza or a trip” than to vote. That is objectively not true.
Thirty-five percent of states have no requirement voters show ID to vote, another 25 percent accept secondary “proof” such as a utility bill to prove residency and who you are. Only 20 percent of states have a strict photo ID requirement to vote.
Beyond not protecting the sanctity of a person’s vote through requiring them to prove they are themselves – hardly a barrier in the 21st century – absentee voting and early voting have made it easier than ever to vote. Too easy, in fact.
To vote absentee used to require providing a verifiable reason you couldn’t vote on Election Day. No more.
In 1978, California instituted a “no excuses” absentee ballot process. “The law repealed the requirement that voters show or claim that they were sick, out of town, or otherwise unable to come to the polling place in order to use an absentee ballot,” according to John Fortier’s book “Absentee and Early Voting.”
Now, 27 states allow “no excuses” absentee voting, which expanded to more than 30 percent of the vote in 2008.
In 37 states, polls now open days or weeks early. This should raise the question: How easy do we have to make it to vote?
Voting wasn’t difficult to begin with – go to your polling place on Election Day and cast your ballot. Simple.
Sometimes there were lines, but lines weren’t considered unjust or disenfranchising. Waiting was a part of life before the immediacy of the microwave and Internet.
Is waiting now a bridge too far? A violation of rights? Of course not.
But to say as much, to suggest returning to a “day of” voting method, would be viewed as akin to advocating a poll tax. This all ignores the serious problems with early voting, not least of which are information changes.
Once a ballot is cast, it’s cast. New information in the weeks leading up to Election Day – scandal, change in position, anything – will not bring that ballot back from the box.
Voting is a measure of the public’s will at a given time. If that given time is changed or extended, it perverts the true measure of that will.
Another problem with early voting is a fact of nature: People die.
According to the Centers for Disease Control, 2.6 million Americans died in 2013, which works out to 7,115 deaths per day. Today, 34 states and the District of Columbia offer early voting, with many offering voting 30 days of more before Election Day (Wyoming is 40 days). The law of averages dictates many people who vote early die before Election Day, but because ballots are anonymous, they count. They should not.
Elections can be decided by a few hundred votes, some by as little as one. Jokes about Chicago aside, the law of averages dictates people who have died have been difference makers in who our elected officials are. This should not be.
Fraud, too, is a real problem, and it doesn’t have to be rampant to swing an election. Stories of trusted government officials stuffing ballot boxes are common, as are stories of people showing up to vote being informed their ballot had already been cast and studies suggesting illegal aliens have voted in large numbers.
There is a lot of talk about making voting easier, but perhaps it’s time we shift the discussion to protecting the sanctity of the vote. Doing away with early voting would be a good step in that direction, as would returning the requirement to show cause for voting absentee and proving you are who you are when you do vote.
Voter fraud may or may not be rampant, but when so many races come down to a few votes, it doesn’t have to be. Ensuring ballots were accurately cast by people eligible to do so should be our top priority.
California has registered illegals to vote as part of their state license process of illegals.
The ONLY purpose to oppose Voter ID requirements is to PROMOTE VOTE FRAUD.
Obama is lying, again.
Most other nations make it much harder to vote than we do in the United States.
Most other nations have a national identity card system, which you must show to vote.
Just a pure, unadulterated, lie.
The other part of this lie is that allowing everyone and anyone to vote easily is desireable or postitive.
That is not a given, in fact, it is almost certainly false.
It was in ancient Athens, Greece where the first democracy was formed
There is this thing that has puzzled me. In the last election there were precincts showing voting at 100% for obama. Given the demographic, and perhaps not even that, I cannot conceive this.
No one voted for Mickey Mouse? Or for themselves? Or just screwed up and pushed the wrong button?
Like Hillary winning six of six coin flips...
It depends on the voting machine that is being used. Fox News reported yesterday that Utah allows voting via cell phone. If that doesn’t show danger of ineligibility than I don’t know what does.
Well, that I can believe. She's a witch...
See my comment about proof of citizenship regarding utility bill in post# 1
What does it matter if they were born at home or in a hospital? Their birth should have been registered regardless. That is just a lame excuse.
That must have been longtime ago
Wait until you can vote over the internet.
This is what is called voter fraud and the rats can not win elections without it.
That is factual
My mom was born at home.
Not that I was present to see it. I was only half there...
Her BC says so.
As recently as 1972. Supreme Court decision.
Yeah.
Exactly why there should be no machine voting.
Easy enough that the Democrats do it for you at the office - you don't even have to get off the couch. :)
;-))
It is so easy even dead people can vote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.