“Cruz is now blaming Trump for terrorism in Belgium.”
I’m not seeing how you can come to that conclusion. How is Cruz blaming Trump for the terrorist attacks in Belgium, specifically?
What other conclusion could Ted possibly be implying? He says a day after Trump talks about re-evaluating NATO, Brussels is attacked. What is Cruz trying to say?
OH come on.
How is DT = to the French revolution SPECIFICALLY ... is he cutting off heads??
How does TC = American revolution? Does he follow Washington’s warning against entangling alliances ?
Specifically
He’s not, but lying about Cruz is par for the course with FReeper Trump supporters, so get used to it.
“I’m not seeing how you can come to that conclusion. How is Cruz blaming Trump for the terrorist attacks in Belgium, specifically?”
If you can’t or won’t see the innuendo then there’s no sense in explaining it.
My children learned early on not to try this type of subterfuge with me. I detest it.
See how ridiculous it is to make up the meaning of someones words. It’s the same thing Cruz keeps doing. Trump never said we should abandon our allies he said they have to pay their fair share and the freebies are over. Cruz argues with straw-men and anyone who listens to Trump knows that
“I’m not seeing how you can come to that conclusion. How is Cruz blaming Trump for the terrorist attacks in Belgium, specifically?”
Me either—but Trump people only read the teasers and believe everything in those. They refuse to delve a bit deeper.
These anti-Cruz types LIE and LIE and LIE. This is probably the nastiest lie I have seen ever on Free Republic.
Cruz pointed out the irony that Trump just talked about not supporting NATO which is based in Brussels.
In what sense could this possibly be trying blame Trump for the attacks? This sort of lie is EXACTLY what Obama and Clinton did with Bengazi when they claimed it was a spontaneous thing in response to a video. How could Trump’s comments the day before impact a pre-planned attack? The answer is they could not.
Not only that, but Trump’s comments were not supportive of NATO. So why would his comments suggesting less US involvement in NATO motivate terrorists to attack Belgium. The answer: they would not.
Of course logic and reason, and basic honesty and integrity are all out the window with guys like this. He’s been on Free Republic for 6 months, and he spent all 6 months bashing the most conservative, pro-life, pro-family, pro-constitution, pro-self-defense, pro-states-rights, pro-religious liberty candidate in the race.
The irony Cruz is pointing out is that NATO should have more support, not less. This is obvious to anyone. I have never seen worse fabrications posted on this forum ever.
First they lie and claim Cruz blamed Trump for the BLM protestors. Now they lie and claim Cruz blamed Trump for the Belgium attacks. Nasty liars.