“A judge at the time ruled that Caetano’s decision to carry a stun gun was illegal because the Second Amendment right to bear arms only applies to the types of weapons commonly used at the time the amendment was ratified.”
Hmmmmph.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
I don’t see where it says that...true, it may not be considered “arms” I guess, but they probably didn’t have a .38 Chief’s Special with shoulder holster then, did they?
but they probably didn’t have a .38 Chief’s Special with shoulder holster —— then——, did they?
THEN....no radio, no tv, no natl newpapers, no, ah nevermind..These judges are a bunch of anus’....
Yes a stun gun is not a firearm. But it says “the Right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” does not exclude knives or stun guns. Arms are whatever, I as a free man, decide is appropriate to ensure my personal security at any given moment.
These judges need to be impeached and removed from office.
“A judge at the time ruled that Caetano’s decision to carry a stun gun was illegal because the Second Amendment right to bear arms only applies to the types of weapons commonly used at the time the amendment was ratified.”
In those days the people had the same arms as the military. I want my M-60!
“it’s china town” err Massachusetts