Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz says superdelegates never determined Democratic nominee
Politifact ^ | 3/22/16 | Amy Sherman

Posted on 03/22/2016 5:42:11 PM PDT by DeathBeforeDishonor1

Bernie Sanders is far behind Hillary Clinton in the delegate count toward the Democratic presidential nomination, but part of his strategy is to hold out hope that superdelegates will back him at the convention.

What are superdelegates? They’re roughly 700 party officials and other high-profile Democrats who get to vote on nominees at the convention. In theory, they could swing a tight race to one candidate or another.

The vast majority of superdelegates have said they will back Clinton, according to news reports. But Sanders has suggested that in states where he won by double-digit margins, superdelegates should vote according to the wishes of people in their states.

That led to Fox Business News’ Maria Bartiromo asking Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz for her take on superdelegates.

Wasserman Schultz countered that superdelegates aren’t so powerful, according to history.

"The purpose of superdelegates -- which by the way, have never been a determining factor in who our nominee is since they've been in place since 1984 -- is to make sure that party activists who want to be delegates to the convention don’t have to run against much better-known and well-established people at the district level," said the South Florida congresswoman.

Have superdelegates not mattered since they were introduced in 1984? It’s clear that in elections after 1984 they were never needed to settle a nomination. However, they did play a role in 1984, although experts are conflicted about the extent of their power.

(Excerpt) Read more at politifact.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
See...a logical explaination.
1 posted on 03/22/2016 5:42:11 PM PDT by DeathBeforeDishonor1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DeathBeforeDishonor1

So if super delegates just don’t really matter, then why have super delegates in the first place???


2 posted on 03/22/2016 5:45:00 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeathBeforeDishonor1

Does a designated someone email Debbie telling her to breathe? Blink her eyes so they don’t dry out? Not to stare at the sun?


3 posted on 03/22/2016 5:45:19 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeathBeforeDishonor1

Diarrhea mouth Debbie at it again.


4 posted on 03/22/2016 5:52:36 PM PDT by Bullish (Face it, insanity is just not presidential.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeathBeforeDishonor1

Does Debbie remember 1968?


5 posted on 03/22/2016 5:52:53 PM PDT by research99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Just to make sure, in case people don’t believe what television tells them.


6 posted on 03/22/2016 5:55:11 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DeathBeforeDishonor1
Debbie Wasserman Schultz says superdelegates never determined Democratic nominee,

Lol, tell that to Hillary, wench.

7 posted on 03/22/2016 5:56:14 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeathBeforeDishonor1

I am confused about Bernie. I always thought he was an Independent as in Sanders, SEN VT(I). How can he run as a democrap? Maybe this is the democrap strategy. Clinton wins the nomination because all of the delegates for Sanders are null and void because he is not a democrap. Something like that would not surprise me.


8 posted on 03/22/2016 5:58:58 PM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosaicwolf

From what I’ve read, Burney has met the various state requirements to be listed as a Democrat in the primary elections he’s been in.


9 posted on 03/22/2016 6:03:07 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
"From what I’ve read, Burney has met the various state requirements to be listed as a Democrat in the primary elections he’s been in."

Maybe so....but rules can change at the democrap convention just like the Republican Convention. Rules, regulations, and bylaws don't apply to crime families.

10 posted on 03/22/2016 6:06:38 PM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DeathBeforeDishonor1

DWS lies again.


11 posted on 03/22/2016 6:26:06 PM PDT by G Larry (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: research99

In their current form, the superdelegates determined the nominee in 1984. The vote was Mondale 2191 to Hart 1201.
1943 were needed to nominate.

There is no way Mondale would have gotten the nomination without the superdelegates.

Had the superdelegates stuck by Hillary in 2008, she would have gotten the nomination. By June 13, 2008, 463 superdelegates had declared support for Obama. Before the primaries a majority supported Hillary.

She released her delegates, so the floor vote wasn’t all that close.


12 posted on 03/22/2016 7:16:14 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson