Here we go again.
I’m a MAJOR Trump supporter and have been since day one, but I don’t cotton to this kind of innuendo. If there’s actual evidence, then fine, it could be a legitimate issue, but only because Cruz operatives attacked Melania Trump and because Cruz presents himself as wholesome as apple pie and “holier than thou”.
Otherwise, I generally could give a rat’s behind about who sleeps with whom because I don’t necessarily think it’s particularly relevant. After all, Ronald Reagan was a MAJOR womanizer before, after and even while married to Jane Wyman and to some degree when he was first married to Nancy Davis.
But right now, I’ve seen no EVIDENCE about these putative Cruz peccadilloes, just a bunch of BS innuendo. And I don’t necessarily assume that there’s fire just because there’s smoke, because the enemedia is REALLY good at blowing smoke up peoples’ behinds.
“But right now, I’ve seen no EVIDENCE about these putative Cruz peccadilloes, just a bunch of BS innuendo. And I don’t necessarily assume that there’s fire just because there’s smoke, because the enemedia is REALLY good at blowing smoke up peoples’ behinds.”
Well #1 a lot of people do care.
#1a The Democrats WILL care. So either clear this up one way or the other now, or you can let the Democrats do it in a general election, where they aren’t going to care if you dont.
#2 When was the last time a politician has been nailed with a story like this, with this many people, and it turned out to be 100% false?
Agreed. It is just unsubstantiated nonsense.
I'm a Trump supporter as well, and I agree with you. For pastor of a church, it's relevant. For leader of a youth group, it's relevant. But for POTUS, not so relevant.
If a guy comes to fix my leaky roof for example, I don't much care if he committed adultery. I care if he can fix my leaky roof.
As for POTUS, I'd be more interested in a candidate's ties with special-interst groups, his stance towards China, and that sort of thing.
Reagan cheated on Nancy?
I’ve never read that
He’s getting Cained.