Wait, what? r>
After the initial discussion focused more on the issue of Clintons judgment and trustworthiness as well as the likelihood that Clinton set up the server in an effort to evade federal record keeping laws and FOIA requests, program host Joe Scarborough sought to refocus the discussion on the classified information aspect of the investigation.
Rule of Law has never been applicable to the Teflon Klintoons!!! Good luck with this MSLSD - I think Comey and up to 100 FBI personnel are ready to walk if she is not indicted or a special prosecutor/grand jury not assigned.
1 posted on
03/28/2016 1:06:37 PM PDT by
Cheerio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: Cheerio
Some are more equal than others. She’s the pig.
2 posted on
03/28/2016 1:07:36 PM PDT by
New Jersey Realist
(Home of the Free Because of the Brave)
To: Cheerio
Shouldn’t it be a lower bar? ESPECIALLY with her party in the executive?
3 posted on
03/28/2016 1:07:44 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
("There is no limit to the amount of good you can do if you don't care who gets the credit."-R.Reagan)
To: Cheerio
We already know this. If she was a normal person, she’d be in jail already. In fact, there’s a higher bar for prosecuting a Clinton irrespective of whether he or she is running for president.
4 posted on
03/28/2016 1:08:03 PM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: Cheerio
I would propose that the bar should be lower to ensure that our leaders are trustworthy, but who am I to question them.
5 posted on
03/28/2016 1:09:04 PM PDT by
Herzo61
To: Cheerio
Considering rule of law is one of our Constitution’s goals, this person must have attended one of the classes obama allegedly taught.
6 posted on
03/28/2016 1:09:48 PM PDT by
goodwithagun
(March 3, 2016: The date FReepers justified the "goodness" of Planned Parenthood.)
To: Cheerio
I’m sure he would feel the same way if it were a Republican /s
7 posted on
03/28/2016 1:09:53 PM PDT by
Feckless
(The US Gubbmint / This Tagline CENSORED by FR \ IrOnic, ain't it?)
To: Cheerio
There is no bar whatsoever. Washington DC is a progressive-left-Democrat cesspool. Absolutely no one in their power-structure wants to indict Hillary because it would leave them greatly embarrassed and scrambling for a viable candidate.
Obama his Lynch are only going through the motions, so he can claim all due investigations have been done, to run out the clock, and get attention-deficit-disordered Americans tired and bored of the issue.
therefore, nothing will happen to Hillary. She knows it.
9 posted on
03/28/2016 1:10:55 PM PDT by
PGR88
To: Cheerio
These are old charges by people that hate me. There’s this vast right wing conspiracy. bla bla bla.
10 posted on
03/28/2016 1:10:59 PM PDT by
Ray76
(Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
To: Cheerio
The POWER of BEING PRIVILEDGED !
11 posted on
03/28/2016 1:11:29 PM PDT by
Tilted Irish Kilt
( British historian Arnold Toynbee - Civilisations die from suicide, not by murder.)
To: Cheerio
I wondered when the excuses would start, and what they would be
13 posted on
03/28/2016 1:12:11 PM PDT by
A_Former_Democrat
(This household proudly voted for TRUMP)
14 posted on
03/28/2016 1:13:39 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: Cheerio
What happened to equal under the law?
So, she’s getting an affirmative action investigation?
15 posted on
03/28/2016 1:14:45 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
To: Cheerio
How high was the bar set for Richard Nixon?
And who plunged almost gleefully into the prosecution (persecution?) of Nixon, with little regard for law or procedure, but Herself?
Jerome Zeifman, a longtime Clinton critic who was one of Hillary’s bosses on the committee that recommended Nixon’s impeachment back in 1974, charged that Hillary was guilty of unethical, Nixonian behavior during her service on the committee.
Her 1974 service as a junior staff lawyer on the House judiciary committee’s Nixon impeachment panel comes at the very beginning of the “35 years of experience” she so often cites.
For seemingly hating Nixon so much, Herself is STRAINING to emulate or even exceed the excesses that Nixon practiced.
16 posted on
03/28/2016 1:15:43 PM PDT by
alloysteel
(If I considered the consequences of my actions, I would rarely do anything.)
To: Cheerio
If anyone says the secret word tonight
the duck will fly down and pay out a hundred dollars,
thats right folks, to the first person that uses it in normal conversation.
Its a common everyday word that has been know to make politicians soil themselves on the spot.
Tonights TOP SECRET//SCI/SAP/TK/KDK/HCS-O/UMBRA/ORCON/NOFORN/ word is
18 posted on
03/28/2016 1:17:10 PM PDT by
Delta 21
(Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
To: Cheerio
No surprise. The concept of common law has been dead for quite some time.
19 posted on
03/28/2016 1:18:06 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Liberals are the Taliban of America, trying to tear down any symbol that they don't like.)
To: Cheerio
Oh, my. Special Rules For Special People - there never has been a tinpot despotism yet that didn't feature that one. And who are Special People? Why, the political class, of course, especially its newest adjunct, the Journalistic Class, senior union officials, and an entire list of Protected Classes - they're actually shameless enough to name them that these days. I'm convinced we're living in a novel named Animal Farm.
To: Cheerio
Ok... let’s raise the bar we’ll forget about the US CONFIDENTIAL, US SECRET and only prosecute her for the release/storage of US TOP SECRET files on her “private server.”
22 posted on
03/28/2016 1:21:16 PM PDT by
missnry
(The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals crazy!)
To: Cheerio
Of course. What do you little people not understand?
25 posted on
03/28/2016 1:23:02 PM PDT by
tgusa
(gun control: hitting your target.)
To: All
I hereby declare my candidacy for President.
Be right back, I’m gonna go rob the nearest bank. They can’t prosecute me since I’m running for President.
On second thought. ... I don’t need to rob that bank. They will just give me the money, in return for a promise that I’ll support legislation favorable to them.
To: Cheerio
An open admission that there is no equality under the law and encouragement of it by the press. If there is no rule of law for the elite they had better expect no respect for the law from the peons.
29 posted on
03/28/2016 1:26:16 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson