Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drewh

LOL!

How is RE-publishing the WIDELY AVAILABLE GQ pix an “attack”????


4 posted on 03/28/2016 4:02:37 PM PDT by G Larry (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: G Larry

didnt Cruz try and buy the rights to the British GQ pics? (opposition research of course)


6 posted on 03/28/2016 4:04:49 PM PDT by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry

If you have never heard of “copyright law”, please feel free to download and publish all the Getty images you can find on FR. IBTZ.


8 posted on 03/28/2016 4:06:22 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: G Larry

I don’t blame Cruz for the pic. I’ve seen no evidence that he knew in advance, and he handled the nude pic like he handles attacks on himself, by ignoring it until the pic became a distraction. That is the correct approach, based on what works in a political campaign.

I do consider the pic both an attack and sleazy. At least in the short term, the attack looks like it was meant to help Cruz. I suspect the attack was meant more to stop Trump, so that the establishment could pic the nominee - and the nominee was not intended to be Cruz either.


14 posted on 03/28/2016 4:07:48 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson