>>>The naming of Julius Evola is a bit bothersome.
As is the naming of Richard Spencer.
And this:
>>Liberal democracy, they argued, had no better a historical track record than monarchy, while egalitarianism flew in the face of every piece of research on hereditary intelligence. Asking people to see each other as human beings rather than members of a demographic in-group, meanwhile, ignored every piece of research on tribal psychology.
Is quite anti-American, anti-Declaration of Independence.. anti.. well everything America was based upon.
I don’t see how one can read it as other than racism. It seems to oppose tribalism by being tribal.
This philosophy may be alternative, it may be right wing, but it is not conservative, not in the sense of the American Conservative Movement.
Good point.