Posted on 03/31/2016 12:18:43 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
4 am
Good find ...
RE: granted AT BIRTH means by virtue of Meeting requirements of Parent being citizen AND statute.
Let’s say I agree with you. Here’s the bottom line question,
If citizenship is granted AT BIRTH by virtue of Meeting requirements of 1) Parent being citizen AND 2) statute.
Does that qualify as being Natural Born?
Naturalized.
Well, this is where I believe the issue is NOT SETTLED.
It is settled. Citizenship by statute is naturalization.
RE: It is settled.
Who settled it?
If it were settled, why would courts allow Crux to continue campaigning for the Presidency?
SCOTUS.
Yes, exactly. For now, it’s not settled by any means.
Even liberal non-Ted Cruz supporter, Harvard law Prof. Lawrence Tribe says so.
SCOTUS has settled it.
RE: SCOTUS has settled it.
Well, it looks like someone has to put Ted Cruz’s case before the SCOTUS, and if you’re right, he will be disqualified (that is, if he wins the nomination ).
So far, he has won every single challenge.
Not sure if the definition describes ALL of the decisions made by different courts in different states.
What’s there to be afraid of? After all it’s only one candidate.
One other reason is a SINCERE belief that their decision is right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.