Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

OK.

Therefore MEANS granted AT BIRTH means by virtue of Meeting requirements of Parent being citizen AND statute.

That’s my answer.


173 posted on 04/02/2016 1:34:59 PM PDT by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76

RE: Therefore MEANS granted AT BIRTH means by virtue of Meeting requirements of Parent being citizen AND statute.

The statute part for me, is conditional. It is like telling a Muslim-American citizen that you won’t lose your citizenship IF you don’t go about supporting, aiding and abetting terrorists.

So, suppose we have a law ( as Ted Cruz would want ) that says, any American who supports, aid, abets, joins terrorists, he or she LOSES American citizenship.

Now Suppose two different America-Muslim women, one named Fatima and the other Aisha became pregnant after the law was passed.

Fatima became like the San Bernardino terrorist bride and was discovered to be aiding and abetting ISIS. She loses her citizenship while visiting Pakistan. The child is born in Pakistan. What is the citizenship of the child?

Aisha also goes to Pakistan and gives birth to her child but is a law abiding American Citizen. After his birth, she comes back to the USA, What is the citizenship of her child?.

It looks like deciding on the citizenship of Aisha’s child is simple. He is American like his mother.

But what is the determinative factor of his citizenship? statute or His mother’s citizenship?

And is the child considered natural born?


176 posted on 04/02/2016 5:22:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson