Replies

Well that settles it!

Except that the ruling is essentially just affirming another ruling that was based on legal arguments from sources which are known by experts in the field to be spurious and/or just plain wrong.

23 posted on 03/31/2016 12:36:33 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (You can't have a constitution without a country to go with it)

Well that settles it! Except that the ruling is essentially just affirming another ruling that was based on legal arguments from sources which are known by experts in the field to be spurious and/or just plain wrong.

Thanks for that. I will use it if there is ever a case against Trump thrown out. Of Course if it involved Donald Trump all would be righteous wouldn't it (......sounds of harps being played in background with a choir singing, accompanied by a very bright light in the distance........)