[Ray76]

Here is Pellegrini’s ruling

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2755257/PA-TedCruzruling.pdf

He relied on law and precedent only in regard to determining if the case is justiciable.

In regard to “natural born citizen” he relies on articles: “A ‘Natural Born Citizen’ Within the Meaning of the Constitution” by Breckinridge Long, “Who can be President of the United States, the Unresolved Enigma” by Charles Gordon, “Qualifications for President and the ‘Natural Born’ Citizenship Eligibility Requirement” by Jack Maskell, “On the Meaning of ‘Natural Born Citizen’” by Paul Clement and Neal Katyal, “Why senator John McCain cannot Be President” by Gabriel Chin, and “Is Gov. George Romney Eligible To Be President” by Isidor Blum.

These articles are not law and precedent.

[IM2MAD]

I found this...

http://northamericanlawcenter.org/ted-cruz-is-in-the-u-s-senate-illegally/#.Vv09Kk9jln8

[ChessExpert]

Thanks for the informative reply.

From their titles, these articles sound as though they may be serious legal discussions, as opposed to opinion/attitude pieces such as one might find in Newsweek, the New York Times, or National Enquirer.

[4Zoltan]

“These articles are not law and precedent.”

What are the laws and precedents?