Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Court of Appeals won’t hear challenge to Cruz’s ‘natural born’ status
Times Union ^ | 04/02/2016

Posted on 04/02/2016 6:31:49 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Without comment, the state Court of Appeals on Friday refused to hear an appeal in a legal challenge to Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz’s status as a “natural born” American citizen.

The complaint, dated Feb. 16 and received by the state Board of Elections the next day, does not contest that Cruz is a U.S. citizen and therefore eligible to serve in Congress. His mother was a U.S. citizen when Cruz was born in 1970 in Calgary, which conferred U.S. citizenship on him. (Cruz’s father was at the time a Cuban citizen.)

Cruz also gained automatic Canadian citizenship at birth, though he officially renounced it in 2014.

Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution states that, “no person except a natural born citizen … shall be eligible to the office of president.” The meaning of “natural born” has been kicked around by scholars — whether recognized or self-described — for years.

A state Supreme Court justice and the Appellate Division rejected the suit on grounds that the complaint, filed by two downstate men, was filed well past the deadline to challenge Cruz’s presence on the April 19 state primary ballot.

The rejection by the state’s highest court is the end of the road for the plaintiffs in New York State. Similar suits in other states have been rejected by the courts.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.timesunion.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1stcanadiansenator; bornincanada; canadian; courtofappeals; cruzie; cruzisobama; globalistcruz; ineligible; naturalborn; noteligiblecruz; openboarderscruz; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 04/02/2016 6:31:49 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Democrats won’t take it to court.

Democrats will take it to the senate like they did in 2008 with McCain under the same definition of NBC they used then.

Cruz will fail the test.


2 posted on 04/02/2016 6:33:34 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well if a foreign born Islamic enemy agent can be POTUS I guess anyone can.


3 posted on 04/02/2016 6:33:53 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Can we please kill the guy already who invented the saying "My bad"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

?


4 posted on 04/02/2016 6:33:57 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Another blow to the anti Cruz birthers.

Those judges are taking all of the fun out of posting here:)

5 posted on 04/02/2016 6:34:06 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Corrupt judges.


6 posted on 04/02/2016 6:35:11 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

This doesn’t help - no one giving substantive review. Another punt, issue remains unresolved. Somebody somewhere has to try the matter.


7 posted on 04/02/2016 6:39:24 PM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

I wish that my prediction skills in this matter were as powerful as my bracket for the NCAA Tourney


8 posted on 04/02/2016 6:39:40 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham; skeeter

Pennsylvania already did.


9 posted on 04/02/2016 6:41:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

“Another blow to the anti Cruz birthers.”

“Those judges are taking all of the fun out of posting here:)”

United State v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized....”


10 posted on 04/02/2016 6:42:11 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

this is the dumbest argument in the history of the internet


11 posted on 04/02/2016 6:42:16 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Goodbye America.


12 posted on 04/02/2016 6:43:46 PM PDT by Enduro Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

That there “Constitution thingy”??

The courts don’t give a sh!t.

The “rule of Law”—gone bye-bye.


13 posted on 04/02/2016 6:48:02 PM PDT by Flintlock (The ballot box STOLEN, our soapbox taken away--the BULLET BOX is left us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Another blow to the anti Cruz birthers.

Dude, it's the primaries. If Cruz somehow wins or is handed the GOP nomination, or is selected as VP, the Left's judges will declare open season on him.

Trust me, this is their Royal Flush to destroy Cruz.

14 posted on 04/02/2016 6:50:02 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Rafael Cruz: Canadian-born, Cuban ancestry, ineligible for POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The United States Congress is responsible for dealing with this kind of case but has handed off responsibility to the Circuit Court of Washington, D.C. The only way to stop Cruz is by a lawsuit in the Washington, D.C., circuit court.


15 posted on 04/02/2016 6:58:34 PM PDT by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE USA OF TWO USA CITIZENS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

You’re dreaming. And if you don’t think a lefty judge will at some point that’s irresponsible. A county judge in PA cited a law review article. Yep, that’s the thorough examination of a Constitutional matter the country needs.


16 posted on 04/02/2016 7:01:33 PM PDT by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

We have a right to believe in the US constitution, including Article I, section II, clause 5; and a lot of us still do, so call us “birthers” if you will. For me, it is not perjorative.

Indeed, if we “birthers” can save our Republic, we will make sure that never again will there be allowed a presidential candidate who does not meet this standard, along with the rest of the constitution that is presently being ignored.

You will never ever ever ever convince us that Ted Cruz will uphold the constitution, when the very fact he is running for president proves the constitution means nothing to him.


17 posted on 04/02/2016 7:06:17 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham
This doesn’t help - no one giving substantive review. Another punt, issue remains unresolved. Somebody somewhere has to try the matter.

They have been punting the issue since t least 2008. I doubt anyone is going to feel the obligation to try the issue.

18 posted on 04/02/2016 7:10:24 PM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Post of the day!


19 posted on 04/02/2016 7:10:59 PM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: erkelly
Nor would I ever try. By now I understand how many Trump supporter feel about Cruz. And Cruz supporter, for that matter.

But you should understand that not agreeing with you makes us evil or love the Constitution less than you do.

20 posted on 04/02/2016 7:12:41 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson