It’s honestly outrageous to pretend Cruz is a worse candidate than Romney.
It really is.
Your banking on some false moderation myth that should now be thoroughly debunked but you continue to invoke it.
I guess because you’re a zealot for trump.
If the nation continues to seek the punishment of democrats as it did in 2010 and 2014 then Cruz could win any state that Romney lost.
If Hillary is less popular than Obama Cruz could win any state Romney lost.
It really is that simple.
Stop bashing Cruz. I think trump is anti conservative but if you want to argue for trump electorally then explain it.
‘could’
or
could not
are hardly definitive responses.
==
Take the blinders off and you will see that Cruz is about as unpopular as Romney was in 2012. What is going to endear him to those who refused to vote for Romney? Even his ‘conservatism’ has been called into question. And his connections with the Bush family/establishment are too many to ignore. He cannot run as an outsider any more than Hillary can.
==
Regarding your: ‘stop bashing Cruz’
Re-read my post. I did not bash Cruz. I only asked which states would he win that Romney didn’t.
But I also asked the same question of Kasich.
As for Trump, I consider him a wild card that doesn’t fit the preconceived political mold because he is drawing voters from all levels.
I did not say Cruz was a worse candidate than Romney.
Instead of being so defensive at my questions in the previous post, why not try to answer some them?
As for your claim that I am a zealot for Trump — I only stated that he was drawing primary voters from factions previously unknown to staunch Republicans. I just posed the question as to whether such draws would continue in the general election or whether those voters would return to Hillary in the fall.