Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/03/2016 10:13:50 AM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jazusamo

Perhaps sending it back to a lower court is part of the plan. Lower courts are not deadlocked by having an equal numbers of judges, well at least most of them.


2 posted on 04/03/2016 10:17:31 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

See! having a SCOTUS that can’t act, is a good thing! We need term limits for them too!


3 posted on 04/03/2016 10:18:07 AM PDT by vette6387 (Obama can go to hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Obama will do what ever he wants to do no matter what they say


6 posted on 04/03/2016 10:23:47 AM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

7 posted on 04/03/2016 10:25:57 AM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Presidents cannot make new laws on their own.

DACA is illegal.

DAPA is illegal.

Presidents can’t shield fraudulently documented foreigners from our laws against fraudulently documented foreigners.
Presidents who do such should be impeached.


8 posted on 04/03/2016 10:32:38 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

The ones that caused this issue to go up the ladder went against Obama.

I thought a 4-4 means the lower court stopping of Obama is where the result ends?


9 posted on 04/03/2016 10:33:41 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
It would enable states to essentially have unilateral veto power over federal policies not only in the immigrations arena, but other areas where the federal government is steering the course

Why yes little missy Crow, that's the point.

The federal government doesn't have the right to "steer the course" against the people's laws OR the States.

The States are sovereign. Maybe she hasn't heard about that.

11 posted on 04/03/2016 10:42:34 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
Hussein, when instructed by Valerie, will ignore the Court. Or the Constitution. Or statutory law. Or precedence. Or the states. Or the will of the people.

When the HELL will "The Hill" or any other claptrap organization that PRETENDS to be "journalism" wake up and realize this cabal of scofflaws in the Democrat party don't give a DAMN about pursuing order and a decent civilization?

The entire GAME is to tear down Western society. And that is done by fomenting destruction. Not the creative destruction that is wrought by capitalism and competition, but the evil destruction wrought by fascism and amoral values.

14 posted on 04/03/2016 10:58:50 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper (Just say no to HRC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I predict 5-3 with Kennedy joining the commie libs, as he did against Arizona


15 posted on 04/03/2016 12:36:50 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson