Ex-Breitbart Reporter Michelle Fields Receives Chilling Death Threats (Audio)

The Wrap ^ | 5 April, 2016 | Brian Flood

[G Larry]

Ex-Breitbart reporter Michelle Fields, who alleges that Donald Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski assaulted her, contacted authorities last week after an individual made death threats against her.

Audio at link

[livius]

My work? I don’t post violent things because I don’t think that’s what American politics should be. Go look at any of the Trump threads and also his statements and those of his minions, and that’s where you’ll see violence, encouragement to violence, and just spewing hatred.

[Responsibility2nd]

You can be happy with either one but still believe Cruz should step asisde.

More double speak rhetoric. See post 120.

If you think someone should step aside - then you DO NOT support them.

You and mk are trying to manipulate JR's words as his being a Trumpist.

[MIA_eccl1212]

I was agreeing with you!
Post away.
Fields of the anti Trump hack.

[conservative98]

I wouldn’t call it being anti-Cruz. I would call it facing reality. You can still support either one if they win the primary, like most of us including me do, but still believe Cruz should step aside.

[ground_fog]

This is a false flag my god everybody falls for it

[mkjessup]

Your "proof" of April 1, 2016 was made obsolete the very next day:

Great! He [Cruz] aces Wisconsin. Then he faces the same hurdle with the next state, and the next, etc, including NY, NJ, etc. It's gonna be rougher than a cob getting 80% or better per state in the remaining states. Not a lot of room for error. But maybe Rove, Romney, RINO GOPe & Co. have it all chalked out for the Consistent Constitutional Conservative™ to take the GOP nomination. We can always trust in the RINO GOP to pave the way for grassroots conservatism.

112 posted on 4/2/2016, 12:37:48 AM by Jim Robinson

Which was preceded by this post 25 minutes earlier:

If Cruz does not win 88% of the delegates in Wisconsin he’s toast. There’s no way he’s going to win 88%+ in the rest of the states. Trump is no shoo-in either, but he’s got a little more wiggle room. Yes, but Cruz has Rove, Romney, Beck, Carly, Walker, Bush, Rubio, Perry, the entire GOPe, plus Obama, Hillary, Sanders and almost the entire Democrat party, +Fox News and 99% of the media pulling for him to steal it at the convention, so we’ll see.

I think they’re claiming God is on the Cruz bandwagon, too, so it’s going to be a rough one.

85 posted on 4/2/2016, 12:12:56 AM by Jim Robinson

Now you read the above post and tell me that it sounds like Jim is all gung ho at this point in time for Ted Cruz.

I understand your desperation here, but the facts in this instance are not your friend.

[mkjessup]

*PING* to my post #126

[Guenevere]

Well Larry...
......it’s hard to know.....when someone keeps crying ‘wolf’
Her credibility is less than sterling

She seems to have a pattern of calling attention to herself, and accusing others of misdeeds
....and we know she lied about Lewandowski

Next question

[stephenjohnbanker]

FACTS are stubborn things........

LOL

[AmericanInTokyo]

You just proved my point!

[plewis1250]

"The video did not show him assaulting her or nearly throwing her to the ground as she swore in her statement to the police."

This is a lie. She never said that she was thrown to the ground in her sworn testimony. Do you think the Jupiter PD is that reckless to continue with charging Corey if there was video evidence contradicting the victim's sworn testimony?

Of course not. This is pure character assassination of a victim, and it is disgusting.

The man put his hand on her arm, and forcefully pulled at her, causing a bruise.

Look up the definition of simple battery in Florida... what he did fits it perfectly:
784.03 Battery; felony battery.— (1)(a) The offense of battery occurs when a person: 1. Actually and intentionally touches or strikes another person against the will of the other;

He touched/struck her against her will, given the bruise and obvious backwards/downward movement of her body in the video.

You're just trying to get around the fact that the candidate of your choice has taken the low road and not done anything to punish Corey for his actions.

[Responsibility2nd]

Code Red.

 

 

You're dancing around the issue hard and fast here, aren't you? You know you WANT to call Jim Rob a Trumpist. You WANT to believe he does not support Ted Cruz as he wants him to step aside.

So go ahead and do it.

Say it.

[mad_as_he$$]

See violence? Really? You may be to delicate or stupid to be on political threads. The only people that started violence at political functions this year are the left’s minions.

[plewis1250]

Ah yes, because she really was hellbent on ending her career for the company providing the most glowing coverage for Trump...

What would her motive be? Why even bother with having to have ACTUAL video of the even take place in front of hundreds of people. Why not just say he assaulted her in the parking lot where no one was around?

If she was lying and trying to extort the campaign (for what, who knows what your mind will event) then why do it in probably the worst place you could...?

[JediJones]

No, she hasn't been dishonest. Is this incident another one you think she was "lying" about?

[conservative98]

Go mkjessup, go. It’s clear what Jim Rob’s position. And it will be even more clear in 2 weeks. I’m done with this topic.

[HarleyLady27]

Someone who has been on for a few months, and they are going to tell us people who have been on here for 15 years what we are going to do? NOT TO ME!!!

And you know me well enough I don’t lash out just at anyone, but when I do, it’s for a real good reason!!!

If they don’t like it when they get it back, don’t dish it OUT!!!

[ozzymandus]

So what, Larry?

[stephenjohnbanker]

BINGO

[Responsibility2nd]

Your "proof" of April 1, 2016 was made obsolete the very next day:

 

___________________________________________

 

Obsolete? Jim retracted his official endorsement? Dude. You're lying. Jim has stated its going to be hard for Cruz, but for you to state that Jim LIED and walked back this comment is pathetic...

 

To: TheRake; All

Here’s my official endorsement re: Trump v Cruz, et al:

Free Republic will be happy with either of our leading anti-establishment candidates and is committed to supporting whichever of these two fine pro-America candidates wins the nomination.

In fact, FR is committed to supporting whichever leading pro-America candidate results from this primary over the godless America-hating socialist democrats.

The survival of our nation is paramount to all other concerns at this time.

We are on a mission from God:

To secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.

291 posted on Friday, April 01, 2016 12:16:06 PM by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)

[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

Here’s my official endorsement re: Trump v Cruz, et al:

Free Republic will be happy with either of our leading anti-establishment candidates and is committed to supporting whichever of these two fine pro-America candidates wins the nomination.

In fact, FR is committed to supporting whichever leading pro-America candidate results from this primary over the godless America-hating socialist democrats.

The survival of our nation is paramount to all other concerns at this time.

We are on a mission from God:

To secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.