Posted on 04/07/2016 3:58:00 AM PDT by gusopol3
Unless one has “contributed” to someone else. Check out his illegal contribution to Pam Bondi and then she inexplicably “drops” investigation into the Trump “university”. He has “contributed” enough dollars to enough people to get mostly anything he wants.
“I wish someone could explain why she makes over 800k per year at Goldman and authors papers on creating a north American union for the CFR.”
Because that’s her job. Might want to read up on her life. She is brilliant in her own right, religious and has served faithfully.
Servant, I'm tired of the garbage on both sides, including your response to the above statement from Mechanicos. In his statement, he called your "attempt at mocking" pathetic and said he laughed at you for it. In response, you lied:
You post the words "ridiculous", "pathetic" and "Alinsky" in describing me personally ("you/your").
For those that care to comprehend the actual words, Mechanicos aimed his derision where it belongs in a civilized debate - at the argument, not the person. Given your demonstrated command of the English language, I cannot conclude that you misunderstood the words he used, but rather decided to mischaracterize them in order to try and gain further rhetorical advantage. In other words, a lie.
“The idea that GS pays someone $800,000 for nothing would be the fantasy that needs to be supported with evidence, rather than vice versa.”
She manages accounts for people with over 40 million dollars invested. $800k is a pittance.
“The idea that GS pays someone $800,000 for nothing would be the fantasy that needs to be supported with evidence, rather than vice versa.”
She manages accounts for people with over 40 million dollars invested. $800k is a pittance.
The Yankees paid ARod 25 million a season to fail 7 out of 10 times.
[Cruz’s Wife Heidi to Take Unpaid Leave From Goldman]
Being a cynic, her salary has still been paid but held for her until after the election, even if Raphael loses OR wins, she will receive a huge back pay.
Perhaps but there seems to be an unusual level of raw hate from the Cruz camp. I know some Trump supporters can be pretty raw but the Cruz crowd are viscious with a totalitarian bent.
I remember the hope we had when a ‘pro-life’ President George W Bush was elected. For eight years he paid lip-service to the movement. Only after he left office did we get to understand that Laura was pro-choice all along. So, yeah, it’s somewhat possible that Heidi’s leanings would affect her husband.
Who started the wife wars anyway? THE SLIMY CANADIAN
Lyin’ Ted...lying his ass off and demonstrates he, like Hellry, is a CONGENITAL LIAR.
https://twitter.com/Dad_Trump2/status/717772363065081856
Do your research Trump did not get the property by eminent domain and bought it direct from another at fair market value. But then the Ryan nominating crowd is immersed in the Globalist lawyer’s lies about Trump and do not want the truth.
Bwwahahaha, sums it all up.
Why are political power couples all so dubious?
Another 2 for 1, just like the Clinton’s and Obama’s...
Ironic - I point out the obvious and you say that brings my integrity into question - while you claim to notice things about Cruz but really don't give a flip because he's your guy. Some of his "core values" seem to have morphed over the duration of the campaign but those who find "the possibility of an issue" with anything Trump are apt to forgive Cruz because he's in a battle to try to be President - as he takes a tack that's more likely to leave our side so disorganized and despondent that Hillary gets a free ride to Pennsylvania Ave. I suppose you'll all decide it was all Trump's fault when we give the WH away --- again.
The NERVE of people in public life who make a lot of money! ;-)
There has been celebration among Trump boosters that Cruz may have been unfaithful to his wife ; it has gone on and on and on. Big time celebration. It’s 5! It’s 8! It’s interns! It’s prostitutes! He a sex addict like Cosby! Heidi cancelled all her appearances!! And you want to talk about trying to demoralize?
Would be nice if neither side looked for crap but it has already been stirred into the mix by both candidates (more directly attributable to Cruz than to Trump) and part of it.
Cruz has his own personal vendetta and will end up handing the WH to Hillary if he manages to stop Trump (with the help of the GOPe/RNC/MSM (what's up with all them collaborating together like that?) because those helping him trash Trump do not support Cruz - he's their next target if he manages to knock Trump out. He has taken a win-win situation and made it a lose-lose one because the voters will be won out and disgruntled at the antic that took a sure winner out and did more to screw with the right side of the aisle than Obama did to race relations.
Well said,; however, the democrats have problems of their own. I’d like to be able to focus on them as well.
That was tit for tat - after hundreds of false claims against Trump, there was finally a thorn being applied to Cruz. But, when it happens to your guy, it suddenly becomes a no-no. Your house must be gloomy if your favorite sports team loses.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.