Townhall.com, by Steve Chapman.
Posted on 04/07/2016 8:27:32 AM PDT by Kaslin
by chapman’s logic, the people with “issues” who think they are cats should be allowed to use a litter box in public.
So he says that things have been working just fine before any explicit bathroom laws were passed, then why not leave things alone?
Instead the queers want to expand it so that a man who dresses like a man and looks like a man can go into a women’s facility make the women very uncomfortable simply because he claims that at that moment he happens to “feel” he’s a woman.
My wife goes in to the women's room and checks to see that no one is inside. Our women folk (family) go into the restroom, always supplied with adequate disinfecting products.
I (and my sons, if with us) stand outside the women's room and guard the door. When women approach, we state that the room is full (which is true in most restaurants, because we have a large family), but that it will be available momentarily.
When our women folk emerge, it is obvious that we weren't deceiving any one.
No one has ever complained.
I would like to see where he gets his numbers supporting the idea there are more women with surgically attached penises than there are men or women who simply dress to appear as the opposite sex.
“Some residents of North Carolina don’t like the idea of sharing restrooms with transgender men and women,”
A couple mistakes right off the bat. It’s not some but the vast majority. Also it’s not just restroom but any facility including showers, dressing rooms, etc.
Segregated bathrooms are there so there is no possibility of copulation in a bathroom, so no one can get pregnant in a bathroom, and in most cases, so no one is sexually attracted to the other people in the bathroom.
It is not about ‘preference’.
It is about protecting our kids and spouses from being exposed to the other sex, or being sexually assaulted.
There is this utopian idea that a ‘transgender’ magically changed sex and is only attracted to the gender they don’t purpose to be. That is not true. First of all, what we are now calling ‘transgenders’ are not, since they have not had an operation yet, they are transvestites, people in drag. That means that they are confused about their sexuality and are very likely bisexual as well.
I don’t want a full grown man in drag, being in the same bathroom as our girlfriends, spouses, daughters. The same with a full grown woman praying on teenage boys, or displaying her body to them in a bathroom.
The current laws are not ‘human rights’ they are ‘institutionalized sexual assault’ and should be stopped.
Townhall.com, by Steve Chapman.
Like I said in an other thread on the same subject a couple of weeks ago that they should just do it like they do it in a Doctor’s office where there is only one bath room. You go in and lock the door and the next person has to wait until you come out. Problem solved
TransGenderism and TransFelinism emanate from the same mentally ill perspective.
Town Hell can go screw itself
No, because the freaks will always find a way to be offended or opposed. And besides, why should the rest of us be inconvenienced to accommodate them?
But then does that mean we have to retrofit every public restroom everywhere, just to make the LGBT peoples and liberals happy???
Exactly the point I have made at every opportunity.
If that's the case and I have no doubt it has...
What's the point of the ordinance??
I'll answer.
So they can be exhibitionists about it. Flaunt it .
But the ordinance goes beyond transgender dressing. It allows anyone to use any bathroom depending what sex they feel they are that day. Even less restrictions than that. And to that add locker rooms, dressing rooms.
BTTT
*rme*
Well so be it, besides who wants to go into a public bath room.
By the BGLTQWERTY crowd bringing this up they’ve opened a can of worms.
Had they left this alone no one would have been the wiser, but no they desperately want their lifestyle to be accepted.
Welcome to the ‘silent majority’ drawing the line.
Yes, men dressed as women have been using women’s bathrooms for years. You can usually tell by the size of the shoe with the high heels. Their makeup frequently gives it away too. Never had a problem.
The other night I was in a restaurant and a number of ‘women’ with big feet and wigs walked by. When I went to the (female only) women’s room I walked by their table. There were 10 or 11 men dressed as women having dinner. The hostess had placed them in the back of the restaurant.
That’s very different from letting random men into the locker rooms, bathrooms, and showers.
This is too stupid for a normal human mind to dream up.
Because .01 percent of the population might walk into your women’s bathroom with a sewn on penis, because they’re really a woman, Americans should want men permitted to walk into women’s restrooms.
Do I have that right?
What kind of ignoramus dreams this stuff up?
Bruce Jenner, by the way, is still walking around with all his equipment, and he’s still claiming that he’s a lesbian...in other words, attracted to females sexually.
Who’d a thunk it?
It's becoming the prominent system in the media. If you watch FNC, almost all of them will eventually show they are for gay marriage, abortion, legal drugs, ect. You may have even liked their positions on foreign policy or tax structure but then it spews out of their pie hole about "What I do doesn't affect you in any way". I'm sick of having to explain why 2 men are kissing to my daughter. It DOES affect me and my family. When a drug pusher gives an "8 ball" to your daughter, many Libertarians might think differently about drugs, but then it's too late. As you get older and wise, you get more conservative. A Libertarian is NOT a conservative. Ergo, Ron Paul and Rand Paul fizzling out with less than 5%. They may have won if they ran as a Dem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.