Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hoodat
I had a feeling you would try to spin this. That is a catch all disclaimer for the 3 source of funds if you use the Source of Funds drop-down. Pay attention at the top before it lists the donors:

From the opensecrets.org link: "This page shows contributions grouped by contributor to the candidate's campaign committee only." (the other drop-downs will specify how those were acquired).

The catch-all disclaimer may or may not apply to this but one thing is for sure. You claimed Goldman-Sachs did not give a dime to Ted Cruz's campaign and that turned out to be not true as in some way or form here, they did.

CGato

128 posted on 04/08/2016 4:32:15 PM PDT by Conservative Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]


To: Conservative Gato
You claimed Goldman-Sachs did not give a dime to Ted Cruz's campaign and that turned out to be not true as in some way or form here, they did.

Again, they did not. That would be illegal. The amounts given come from employees of Goldman-Sachs. Big difference. Your claim that Goldman-Sachs contributed to the Cruz campaign is patently false.

135 posted on 04/08/2016 4:40:15 PM PDT by Hoodat (Article 4, Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson