Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hoodat
Again, they did not. That would be illegal. The amounts given come from employees of Goldman-Sachs. Big difference. Your claim that Goldman-Sachs contributed to the Cruz campaign is patently false.

OMG! Goldman-Sachs wouldn't be listed there if there wasn't some way around it like it is explained in the catch-all disclaimer. It just said it couldn't be at the federal level but it does explain how else it can be done. It's right there in blue and white. It's true or Goldman-Sachs wouldn't be listed.

CGato

139 posted on 04/08/2016 4:50:40 PM PDT by Conservative Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: Conservative Gato

“OMG! Goldman-Sachs wouldn’t be listed there if there wasn’t some way around it like it is explained in the catch-all disclaimer. It just said it couldn’t be at the federal level but it does explain how else it can be done. It’s right there in blue and white. It’s true or Goldman-Sachs wouldn’t be listed.”

Bernie, shouldn’t you be working on the campaign trail?

Hitlery is the target, remember?


151 posted on 04/08/2016 5:29:25 PM PDT by diamond6 ("I'm going to do EXACTLY what I told you I'm going to do!" - Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson