Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North American Law Center to Cruz: ‘Two Weeks to Admit You’re a Fraud – or We Will’
ETFNEWS.COM ^ | 07 APRIL 2016 | ETFNEWS.COM

Posted on 04/08/2016 5:08:31 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

“In 2 weeks the North American Law Center will release proof that Ted Cruz is a fraud. They have issued his campaign a warning that if Cruz doesn’t tell the truth and step down they will release their proof – the truth that so many refused to believe or listen to.” – Karen Bracken

The North American Law Center issued this stark notice to the Cruz campaign on their latest podcast on April 3 (19:00 mark) –

“We’re talking about American citizens (who) think a guy who’s Canadian-born is eligible to be a U.S. president – without any documentation whatsoever. If Ted continues on – we are going to release the files we have, two weeks from tonight, and we will bury Ted Cruz forever in American politics… If we have to stop this guy from defrauding this nation, then we are going to do that.” – J.B. Williams, N.A.L.C.

(Excerpt) Read more at endingthefed.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canadian; canuck; cruz; cruzie; cruznadian; eligibility; fraud; ineligible; naturalborncitizen; potus; usurper; williams
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 481-489 next last
To: Cboldt

No. The requirements for American citizenship are not the same or as rigorous as the requirements for being eligible to run for the presidency. In the latter case, BOTH parents must be naturalized American citizens at the time of the candidate’s birth. Cruz’s parents were NOT BOTH naturalized American citizens at the time of his birth. His father did not become a naturalized American citizen until 2005! Cruz was born in 1970. Sorry, that’s not gonna work.


181 posted on 04/08/2016 7:00:23 PM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido; All
Never heard of them. What are they, a bunch of fags?

Why, you looking for a bunch of fags to hang out with?

If so, you're on the wrong website.
182 posted on 04/08/2016 7:00:30 PM PDT by mkjessup (We Don't Know. Where Heidi Went. But She Won't Be Married. To The President. Burma Shave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
It sounds to me like they are trying to be decent and offer Cruz the opportunity to repent. We often tell our kids, when they lie, tell me the truth, because lying is worse than what you did. We go easier on criminals in court if they will stipulate to their actions.

Sounds like they are trying to give Cruz the opportunity to salvage a bit of his respect, apologize for trying to dupe the public, and perhaps in the remainder of his life, by turning his life around right now, he can gain some modicum of forgiveness and acceptance by his fellow citizens.

183 posted on 04/08/2016 7:00:40 PM PDT by gg188 (Ted Cruz, R - Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

Are you purposely ignoring the fact that it was the FOUNDERS who passed and signed into law the Naturalization Act of 1790. You do know it was signed into law by non other than George Washinton right?

It clearly shows that the founders had a very different idea as to what qualified as a NBC BECAUSE THEY ACTUALLY SAID SO.


184 posted on 04/08/2016 7:01:22 PM PDT by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

You are right, read 1795. Citizens (plural) kids born outside are citizens. Lots of plurals in there for only having ine American citizen parent.


185 posted on 04/08/2016 7:02:12 PM PDT by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

No, you are not correct. The act you refer to is a Naturalization Act. If Cruz’s Mom or later Cruz himself provided documentation to the State Department that his circumstances fulfilled the requirements of the statute he would be eligable to be a Naturalized citizen, never a natural born citizen.


186 posted on 04/08/2016 7:02:40 PM PDT by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead

Ine = one. Dang these fat fingers lol


187 posted on 04/08/2016 7:02:53 PM PDT by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: 4Runner

Please site the law that leads you to believe that BOTH parents must be citizens in order to qualify as NBC. Here is a hint, you wont find one.


188 posted on 04/08/2016 7:03:02 PM PDT by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

189 posted on 04/08/2016 7:03:21 PM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Ask about franchise opportunities in your area.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beandog
who the heck cares.

You should, unless you want some future ISIS headchopper running for President.

190 posted on 04/08/2016 7:03:37 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Ohhh....Derka derka derka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Good, me too. That is why the prompt repealing of the 1790 Naturalization Act is so important.


191 posted on 04/08/2016 7:03:50 PM PDT by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: patlin

I’ve debated the meaning of NBC to know FAR more about it than the birthers here. They were full of bull when claiming Obama didn’t meet the standard, and are full of bull when they claim Cruz does not.

But if you want NBC of two NBC parents Hillary as President, trusting in her love of country, go ahead.


192 posted on 04/08/2016 7:05:51 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of infants, ruled by their emotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie
Blah blah. Put up or shut up.

Exactly. Not another well-timed for the next primary insinuation of misdeeds or whatever followed up with a nothing burger with a side of lies.

There is an emerging pattern, there.

193 posted on 04/08/2016 7:06:26 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Her former next door neighbor in Calgary has given interviews. As for records, the Senator has those sealed.

Sen.Cruz has not been forthcoming with records. This includes who paid for his college education.


194 posted on 04/08/2016 7:06:48 PM PDT by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE USA OF TWO USA CITIZENS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

I am not the one purposely ignoring something. The Founders passed the 1790 Act and almost immediately realized it was flawed and not what they had meant to achieve. They repealed it and the replacement Law specifically did not grant natural born status to foreign born children of American citizens.


195 posted on 04/08/2016 7:06:50 PM PDT by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

From 1790

“The Act also establishes the United States citizenship of certain children of citizens, born abroad, without the need for naturalization: “the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States”

Cruz father had never been a citizen of the United states at the time of birth so even 1790 doesnt apply.

Fundemental lack of understanding.


196 posted on 04/08/2016 7:06:56 PM PDT by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

We do not need any stinkin’ law. It is an eligibility requirement to be President.


197 posted on 04/08/2016 7:08:34 PM PDT by SatinDoll (A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN IS BORN IN THE USA OF TWO USA CITIZENS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

AGAIN: You conveniently forgot that the 1790 Naturalization Act was completely rescinded, and any mention, ever, by Congress, of natural born citizens was replaced by “citizens”.

You open Pandora’s Box~

So you claim all the little bastard offspring milling about SE Asia that are the result of American men abusing sex-tourism are eligible. And you will soon have the jihadi ISIS sons of American brides that elope to the ME. eligible as well.


198 posted on 04/08/2016 7:10:39 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States

Your own quote denies your position.

The father has to be a citizen AND a resident of the US. In other words, your father could be a US citizen, but never have lived here.

199 posted on 04/08/2016 7:11:58 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Ohhh....Derka derka derka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

You, sir, do not have the slightest clue what you are talking about. No one born a US Citizen is naturalized. Naturalization is a form of citizenship that can ONLY be conferred after birth. Read the frikking US Code before shooting off your noxious blanks.


200 posted on 04/08/2016 7:13:33 PM PDT by John Valentine ( Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 481-489 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson