Posted on 04/08/2016 5:08:31 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
“In 2 weeks the North American Law Center will release proof that Ted Cruz is a fraud. They have issued his campaign a warning that if Cruz doesn’t tell the truth and step down they will release their proof – the truth that so many refused to believe or listen to.” – Karen Bracken
The North American Law Center issued this stark notice to the Cruz campaign on their latest podcast on April 3 (19:00 mark) –
“We’re talking about American citizens (who) think a guy who’s Canadian-born is eligible to be a U.S. president – without any documentation whatsoever. If Ted continues on – we are going to release the files we have, two weeks from tonight, and we will bury Ted Cruz forever in American politics… If we have to stop this guy from defrauding this nation, then we are going to do that.” – J.B. Williams, N.A.L.C.
(Excerpt) Read more at endingthefed.com ...
That is correct! There is relevant precedent that, if applied, would reach a conclusion. But precedent is not controlling when it isn't applied.
There is also no controlling legal authority for violation of the Espionage Act by a Secretary of State; or running guns if you are in the BATFE, and so on.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ted Cruz, unAmerican! But Hillary Clinton? NBC all the way, baby! Her birth ensures she LOVES America!
YGBSM! The only thing they will “expose” is their stupidity.
I,would rather groups that have real evidence would just release it, not give ultimatums and waiting periods.
Just release it and if it is true it takes someone down. Why give them the chance to bow out? They probably dont believe someone has anything that could take them down anyway.
Just do it. Let the chips fall wherever.
Another gem by FR Spaulding on Lyin’ Td:
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875):
At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.
With time I could provide a list of over twenty supreme court cases; state courts have no authority to interpret the meaning of terms in the Constitution. The list would obviously include Wong Kim Ark, and Perkins v. Elg, but the point is made. I suspect that it would make no difference to those whose beliefs are based upon other than our founders and framers’ intent. Ted Cruz, with the same constitutional law professor as Obama, clearly thinks he can depreciate the Constitution too. At least Obama never claimed to be a natural born citizen; he let John Roberts do that for him, which should, if we ever return to respect for the Constitution, cause Roberts to be impeached for directly failing to honor and defend the Constituton. Even Cruz’ con. law professor, Larry Tribe, pointed out that Ted was lying about law he knows reasonably well.
Ted, often described as brilliant, is clearly not so smart as he thinks, or his supporters boast. Anyone who knows Constitutional law knows Ted is lying about the authority in the 14th Amendment to create natural born citizens. There is no such authority, not one word about natural born citizenship, and John Bingham, author of the citizenship section, was explicit on that fact in his lectures to the House in 1866.
Cruz has burned his bridges for an appointment to the Supreme Court, or should have, if we manage to move away from oligarchy to representative democracy. Ted may have to face charges for having been a Canadian citizen while a Texas senator. Our naturalization oath requires “sole Allegiance”, and Ted is a naturalized citizen, still a Canadian citizen until 2014. Ted will probably still find the doors open at Heidi’s Council on Foreign Relations, or even, now that Obama, not Congress as the law requires, has opened the doors to Cuba, as an executive for Heidi’s Goldman Sachs’ Cuban division. Our founders, framers, Montesque, Paine, Pufendorf, Bynkershoek, Vattel, Blackstone, Wilson, Marshall, Jay, Washington, Jefferson, ..., all understood that the most universal determinant of a man’s allegiance is the allegiance of his parents. Ted’s father fought with Fidel; Obama’s father’s allegiances were to Marx and Allah, passing his son to Frank Marshall Davis, Saul Alinsky, Khalid al-Mansour and Obama’s patron, Alwaleed bin-Talal.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3417082/posts?page=121#121
Only a court can seal a record. An individual cannot do that and any record that is sealed by one judge can be unsealed by the order of a different judge.
NONE of Ted Cruz’s records are sealed. SOME of Ted Cruz’s records are protected from unauthorized disclosure in the exact same way that privacy laws protect all of our personal data.
So far, no matter how exciting and intriguing, it's just click bait.
But IF they have documentary proof that Ted's mom and dad were both Canadian citizens at the time of his birth in Canada, Cruz would not even be a US Citizen without naturalization...and CERTAINLY would not be "Natural Born".
Remains to be seen.
Just like the whole mistress thing, if they had something they’d use it now. I grow tired of this ridiculous act. Now I know why Herman Cain got out instead of fighting.
Having extensively reviewed all articles cited in this opinion, as well as many others, this Court holds, consistent with the common law precedent and statutory history, that a "natural born citizen" includes any person who is a United States citizen from birth.
Accordingly, because he was a citizen of the United States from birth, Ted Cruz is eligible to serve as President of the United States, and the objection filed by Carmen Elliott to the Nomination Petition of Ted Cruz is denied.
They had only been in Canada a year when he was born. I find it hard to believe you can become a citizen in one year.
Has anyone ever asked him why he has certain records sealed?
They are interchangeable for citizenship, but a CRBA and a birth certificate tell us more than a passport does. In particular, a CRBA tells us that the source of citizenship is a statute, and that evidence has been presented and the claim to citizenship has been adjudicated in light of the statute. A passport doesn't tell us that.
Though this was interesting.
Ted Cruz started out life as a Canadian citizen, and here he is running for POTUS.
Don’t think for one minute the Democrats won’t use this fact against him in a general election.
I don’t understand how much proof is needed. The fact he was born in Canada to a foreign father, coupled with the news that he renounced his Canadian citizenship should have ended any doubt that he was ineligible.
I don’t care what “naturalization” statutes have been enacted since...the framers didn’t want foreigners in the office of the President. They wanted sons of US fathers, and born in the US.
The Constitution has not been amended in such a fashion so as to negate that intent.
o thanks =)
Here we go again. If either of your parents is an American citizen then you are one too no matter where you were born.
"I'm really gonna do it!"
"Don't try and stop me!"
"...Is there anybody out there?"
".....Hello?"
Heh...
What’s the law on that?
Why wait, a fraud is a fraud
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.