Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: New Jersey Realist
the Naturalization Act of 1790...was REPEALED and replaced by the Act of 1795

I was going to comment on that, but he seems impervious to facts.

See the Supreme Court ruling in Rogers v. Bellei 401 U.S. 815 (1971).

See the definition of NBC in Minor vs Happersett. (1874)

349 posted on 04/09/2016 10:49:00 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Ohhh....Derka derka derka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies ]


To: ROCKLOBSTER

I did a long time ago but Bellei is an easier read and a lot quicker to get to the point we are trying to make here. Thanks.


352 posted on 04/09/2016 10:53:12 AM PDT by New Jersey Realist (Home of the Free Because of the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies ]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
Jack Maskell is still at it! You can bet that Congress will rely on this publication, and nothing else.

Of Neologisms, End-Around Runs and Gorillas: The Congressional Research Service 2016 Report on Presidential Eligibility

354 posted on 04/09/2016 11:07:53 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies ]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
If children born abroad to US citizens were also understood to be natural born citizens of the United States when the Constitution was written and adopted, then the 1790 Act would translate as: Natural born citizens of the United States shall be considered natural born citizens of the United States.

Comment at puzo1.blogspot.com

355 posted on 04/09/2016 11:11:55 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson