Posted on 04/08/2016 8:23:53 PM PDT by Kaslin
Feminism is the spear tip.
For more on this, go read the website TheOtherMcCain: he is an investigative journalist who has read *hundreds* of books by leading feminists and documents their quotes and claims.
And, for the nonce, it is amazing that members of the Cruz Cucks Clan, fail to see that publicizing such drivel as this, does nothing more than grease the skids for Hillary : either against Trump, or, should the shenanigans cause a brokered convention, then against the GOP's designated loser(*), when Cruz has served his purpose and is cast aside in his turn.
(*) remember "binders full of women" ? Leftists will seize on *anything* accurate or not. All they need is a pretext. And you are apparently either stupid enough, or wishful-thinking-of-Cruz enough, that you believe you can appropriate, and participate in, their Emmanuel Goldstein outrage for a selected target, then turn it off like a light switch when you no longer have use for it.
Another entry in the Wile E. Coyote Trump Frustration contest.
This is really getting tiresome. Apparently Steve McCann does not know many professional Southern women. We are mostly all for Trump. At least all the ones I know.
Look at how Hollywood degrades women. Look at how the execs there also like little boys. Hollywood supports Bill Clinton and by extension Hillary who likes lesbian muslims.
‘you trump cultists’
You betcha, I’m a Trump supporter. He’s a winner who’s set the pace in the race, not only in votes received and states won, but in policy positions.
I’m a little surprised you’re parroting the ‘cultist’ thing, tho; it’s such a cop-out. It’s obvious as the day is long the purpose of the author, as explicitly mentioned five times, and alluded to in every paragraph, is to beat the Trump is anti-woman drum by resurrecting the very dusty ‘male chauvinist’ label, while employing not so subtle ageism.
So let me say this: We women are not fragile little violets who need a man to tell us who is or isn’t a male chauvinist as if we’re incapable of making that judgment ourselves. That is the ultimate in male chauvinism. And as for a straight male who criticizes a woman’s appearance (gays get a pass, don’tcha know), perhaps the author could ponder a column on Mr. Cruz, in his latest attempt at late-night humor, referring to Hillary as ‘wild eyed’. Which, if I were a flaming feminist (or male apologist as the author appears to be), might just be considered chauvinistic, too. As is Cruz not emphatically denouncing and disassociating himself from the PAC who objectified Melania Trump in a Cruz promotional ad. It doesn’t matter that I agree with Cruz on Hillary - I have an automatic woman hall-pass. But under the author’s own standards, Cruz doesn’t. And while Trump can find excuse in being raised during ‘the chauvinistic era’, as the author points out, Cruz can’t make any such claim. I doubt we’ll see an article calling Cruz out, tho. Which makes this article just another pearl-clutching, double-standard #NeverTrump hit piece in a sea of others.
The author really should go play with the rest of the snowflakes terrified by #TheChalkening.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.