Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sound the Alarm: New Obama Regulations Will Push Private Retirement Savings Into Government Accounts
Townhall ^ | 4/08/16 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 04/09/2016 5:29:50 PM PDT by Libloather

If you thought Obamacare was terrifying, just wait until you read about what President Obama's regulatory agencies are planning to do with your retirement savings.

According to an alarming report in the Wall Street Journal, government regulators at the Labor Department will be implementing new rules at the end of the year that will eventually force private retirement investments into government accounts. How? By making private investment options, specifically IRAs, too burdensome, a liability and expensive. Bolding is mine.

(Excerpt) Read more at m.townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 401k; economy; government; ira; nationaldebt; obamanomics; regulations; retirement; savings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: raybbr

I have cut down my FR to almost nothing because of the utter nastiness of trumps bought and paid for crowd. When it comes down to brass tacks, flat tax and smaller govt the Freepers are saying no. There is and never has been anything constitutional about trump.. So what they say they want, which Cruz offers more of, they no longer want. Some sad status quo psychology at work. Cruzlim.. Wow, how smart they are.. What he said about his infant granddaughter disgusted me.. He is an exemptocrat just like clintoon, pelosi and Reid.. His benefactors.


81 posted on 04/10/2016 2:43:54 AM PDT by momincombatboots ( The only exemptocrat who can win. Well played democrats. Mr single payer 2016 trump..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Ping


82 posted on 04/10/2016 3:03:12 AM PDT by StoneWall Brigade ("A Republic if you can keep it."- Benjamin Franklin Vote Tom Hoefling 2016 to restore the Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Katie Pavlich was one of the NRO “No Trump” authors - not the brightest bulb in the pack.


83 posted on 04/10/2016 3:09:24 AM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Sound the Alarm: New Obama Regulations Will Push Private Retirement Savings Into Government Accounts>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Alternate Title: “ Why I Became an Expat of the USA.”

http://www.expatyourself.com/how-to-become-an-expat/


84 posted on 04/10/2016 3:58:15 AM PDT by Candor7 ( Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

“””What he said about his infant granddaughter disgusted me..”””

I didn’t hear that. I pretty much ignore any thread that has trump or Cruz in it.


85 posted on 04/10/2016 4:33:31 AM PDT by raybbr (That progressive bumpers sticker on your car might just as well say, "Yes, I'm THAT stupid!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

President Clinton ?
Only if the White House is moved to Leavenworth, KS.


86 posted on 04/10/2016 4:46:17 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
President Clinton ? Only if the White House is moved to Leavenworth, KS.
  1. The Obama DOJ will not indict Clinton. Except for an act of God she will be the nominee and will unite the Democrats against the Republican nominee.
  2. The GOPe will not allow Trump to be the nominee, and/or will not allow him to win the general election. Cruz will cooperate with them. They would rather Clinton be President than be led by Trump.
  3. The GOP primary voters will not accept Cruz and somewhere between 10-20% of normal GOP voters will not vote for him, and may vote against him.
  4. Trump may run third party or Independent; he will not win enough votes or states to win the Presidency.
  5. If, by chance, Kasich were to be the nominee, you might have an argument but I doubt he would make it a priority to return Churchill's bust to the White House. He could defeat Clinton though, if he had Trump's and Cruz' endorsements.

87 posted on 04/10/2016 4:55:10 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

For later.


88 posted on 04/10/2016 5:17:56 AM PDT by lysie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

“I have long said that the government will seize our assets...”

If they don’t, they will almost certainly adjust your Social Security payout via means-adjusting. Ants will get pennies, while grasshoppers will get thousands; another example of the government rewarding bad behavior. I stopped contributions to mine because it made no sense to put the money aside now while putting groceries on credit cards; ideally, I’ll have few visible assets (besides the home) when/if I retire...


89 posted on 04/10/2016 6:11:31 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

Agreed. There will be a time when you will be “encouraged” forcibly to trade in your personal savings for some scrip of some kind, and there will be an exchange rate.

If you have a lot of assets, you are going to have a negative exchange rate.

If you don’t have any, your “exchange rate” is going to be a very high positive.

Socials security is a scam, I don’t expect to see any of it. They already have control over that.


90 posted on 04/10/2016 6:26:30 AM PDT by rlmorel ("Irrational violence against muslims" is a myth, but "Irrational violence against non-muslims" isn't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Yeah, by the time I can collect I’ll be 67 - having paid in for more than 50 years...


91 posted on 04/10/2016 6:29:56 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

That’s that thing for me-I am obligated to pay into that scam instead of investing the way I see fit, and won’t ever see anything near the payback. And that is deliberate. A national Ponzi scheme. And we are the late-in suckers.


92 posted on 04/10/2016 6:50:50 AM PDT by rlmorel ("Irrational violence against muslims" is a myth, but "Irrational violence against non-muslims" isn't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

“Can’t read anything from this 20 something principled Cruzlim.”

Are you referring to Katie Pavlich?


93 posted on 04/10/2016 6:58:37 AM PDT by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: major-pelham

then read about it in the WSJ.

Are you so unprincipled that you bury your head in sand rather than understand what is going on?

Seems you have an issue from childhood. You must have been bullied or sullied and still mad.


94 posted on 04/10/2016 7:01:30 AM PDT by doldrumsforgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

This is plan B. They[the Democrats]were working [arguing] on how to implement it. It took them too long o get obamacare set up. Time ran out on them. The Congressional session ended. They [the Democrats] lost control of the House in the ensuing election prior to the nest Congress. The plan was shelved until they regain control of the House. Which, if the Republican Party has anything to do with it, will probably be 2016.


95 posted on 04/10/2016 7:19:41 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Too true; 1%ers can work ways to generate much more income that isn’t subject to SS (interest, dividends, for example). We’re stuck funding this scam, and will see little payout...


96 posted on 04/10/2016 7:23:53 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma
The law of supply and demand encourages investment advisers to have your best interests in mind.

No, it doesn't. Advisers have been caught red handed many times steering small net worth clients into bad investments to provide cannon fodder profit for their connected clients. I agree that removing government completely from the equation is the best solution, but they are already far too involved. The best motive is not some government imposed fiduciary relationship-- it is profit. Let the adviser get paid ONLY as a percent of NET PROFITS on the account annually, no more of this percentage of your portfolio crap. This is how it was done before the government got involved, and is the best by far. The adviser doesn't eat until you do, and is strongly motivated to be creative and find ways to make you both money.

Now they just go for the biggest pot of gold and make a fortune, win or lose; without government fiduciary requirements there is NO motive for them to make money for the smaller client. They love older clients with no financial acumen, because then they don't even have to work the big accounts. I used to assist older members of my church with large portfolios to independtly asses what their financial advisers were doing for them; you couldn't believe it. They were under performing inflation and telling them they were doing fine.

97 posted on 04/10/2016 7:38:23 AM PDT by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives
...then the government turns around and blames the banks.

As planned...

98 posted on 04/10/2016 8:06:23 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
The money was stolen the instant they received it. By design. Since day one.

In fact, you are correct.

Moreover, Social Security is a tax that was untruthfully presented to the American people as an investment savings account.

Congress happens to authorize an entitlement payment for SS recipients, ... at this time, Congress can change or stop this entitlement AT ANY TIME.

99 posted on 04/10/2016 8:31:26 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Question: Does the Federal Government have the legal power to control and direct all your investments and tell you what you can and can't do with your own money and even take it from you if they don't approve of how you're handling it or what you are investing it in?

Answer: Yup.

It's right there in the Constitution For The United States - ARTICLE II, SECTION 5. ... or someplace... Look it up!!

But if for some reason, you can't find it don't bother Congress by asking about it. They are too busy promising other people (contributors and Gibsmedat voters) what they are going to spend it on. Just let at least Five Black-Robed Potentates on the Supreme Court find it for you. It's right there. They'll find it!

100 posted on 04/10/2016 11:27:54 AM PDT by Gritty (Freedom begins with speaking truth. A muzzle is a muzzle even if it is made of silk.-Viktor Orban)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson