Posted on 04/10/2016 12:34:59 PM PDT by mitchell001
Cruz is low handed.
He’s a pathetic loser.
He has destroyed himself in less than a year.
It’s over.
The GOPe needs to focus on the actual target — Hillary. This foaming at the mouth for a Cruz-Trump debate is only because Cruz people think Cruz is so much “smarter” than Trump. Duh. Harvard lawyer versus businessman. That’s not the point. The point is to defeat HILLARY but the GOPe has forgotten....
Throw some barbs at Huma, she’ll go nuts!
Maybe a cage match could settle it. Even though he’s older, Trump will beat his back butt..
A master debator..
There are always some flame wars, but they have become far more common with the Cruz vs Trump divide. But still it’s not as much flame wars as you might see in you tube comments on controversial issues ;-)
Trump can’t walk and chew gum at the same time.. Trumps vocabulary is at a 6th grade level.. Talk abut smart.. He is also losing the unbound delegate fight to Cruz!!!
http://www.trump.com/real-estate-portfolio/
http://www.trump.com/hotel-collection/
http://www.trump.com/golf/
Plus Trump signs 22k paychecks on the FRONT.
The why does he qualify for $300.00 tax credit in New York for people who make less than $500,000. Parade Mag this week says he makes $380 Million a year!!!
I don’t know.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/gates-criticizes-nato-how-much-does-us-pay/
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/23/us-nato-members-increase-defence-spending
Europe’s declining interest in defense:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/03/opinion/scrimping-on-nato.html?_r=0
payblocked:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/natos-spending-slumber-1434993123
even Obama got into it, a shaming of England brought their 2% to the table (a few dozen paragraphs in)
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obama-doctrine/471525/
Brietbart points out the trade imbalance with our NATO partners:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/23/terror-trump-trade-and-nato/
now, to be perfectly fair, WaPo gives Trump a three pinochios, basing that on future promises of Europe to pony up, and caging the “billions and billions” (total to date Trump is talking about) with the old “ annual direct contribution is under $500 million a year” line (which some may agree adds up to billions and billions over just a few years’ time). However, the WP doesn’t address the trade imbalance.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/03/30/trumps-claim-that-the-u-s-pays-the-lions-share-for-nato/
There’s really not much to debate about it other than, how soon NATO members are going to get with the program and pony up or how slow we’re going to walk to their defense if they don’t. And, why is there such a trade imbalance with “partners” who depend on the USA for their peaceful existence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.