Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76
February 4, 1790, while discussing a bill to establish a uniform rule of naturalization:

"The case of the children of American parents born abroad ought to be provided for"

The foreign-born children of citizens have always required naturalization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


374 posted on 04/12/2016 10:15:37 AM PDT by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76

However the actual bill that was passed in Congress and that President Washington signed into law stated that: “”the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States”.

“The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free white persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks, and Asians. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, but specified that the right of citizenship did “not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.” It specifies that such children “shall be considered as natural born citizens,” the only US statute ever to use the term.”—Wikipedia


378 posted on 04/12/2016 11:40:37 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]

To: Ray76

February 4, 1790, while discussing a bill to establish a uniform rule of naturalization U.S. Rep Aedanus Burke (South Carolina) said: “The case of the children of American parents born abroad ought to be provided for, as was done in the case of English parents, in the 12th year of William III”

Burke, presumably, is referring to “An Act for the further Limitation of the Crown and better securing the Rights and Liberties of the Subject”

Stat. Realm Vol. 7, page 636 http://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol7/pp636-638

[] no Person born out of the Kingdoms of England Scotland or Ireland or the Dominions thereunto belonging (although he be naturalized or made a Denizen (except such as are born of English Parents) shall be capable to be of the Privy Councill or a Member of either House of Parliament or to enjoy any Office or Place of Trust either Civill or Military or to have any Grant of Lands Tenements or Hereditaments from the Crown to himself or to any other or others in Trust for him

Here the English law itself acknowledges that the foreign-born child of English parents is naturalized.


392 posted on 04/12/2016 8:16:39 PM PDT by Ray76 (Judge Roy Moore for Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson