Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eleutheria5

Hardly - This is Ibama violating the terms of the 1979 agreement and leaving Israel open to attack.

All part of the plan.


4 posted on 04/12/2016 4:01:34 PM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Skywise

We’re hardly open to attack just because some “peacekeepers” have scarpered and left us to watch our own backs. On the eve of Egyptian attack in ‘67, the peacekeepers did the same, and yet we managed to rout superior Egyptian forces. Now Egypt is acting as an ally and we are partners in routing out ISIS. How long that will last, who can say. But in the interim, Egyptian assault is the very last of our worries.


6 posted on 04/12/2016 4:13:50 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Skywise

Well, then Israel will just have to annex Sinai if attacked from it. Push all the hostile Arabs right across the canal and call it a border.


9 posted on 04/12/2016 5:12:52 PM PDT by Trod Upon (To be labelled "far-right" by modern journalists, one need do no more than NOT be far-left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson