Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I know from personal experience far too much information is classified. Simply getting rid of “confidential” wont do much as it would simply become Sensitive but unclassified.

Pretty much the same security requirements.

From what I’ve read most of Hillarys email server data was Top Secret and above.


2 posted on 04/13/2016 1:11:01 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver

Will probably push that info to be marked secret, not SBU.


4 posted on 04/13/2016 1:13:28 PM PDT by Bobby_Taxpayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: driftdiver

There are still plenty,of other things these would,fall under.

Noforn, internal use only, like,you said unclas but sensitive, etc

The only reason to get rid of it is so people like Clinton don’t have charges thrown at them for removing classified info.


18 posted on 04/13/2016 1:48:39 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson