Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
Jim Robinson said: "Because he [Cruz] has no path to winning honorably via we the voters."

Don't we all wish that the situation was that simple.

Unfortunately, the majority of Republicans have shown multiple times recently that they can select a nominee who is unable to win in the general election.

It could very well be that a better approach to this election is to identify that Republican candidate who is least objectionable to the Republicans in order to garner the majority of independents.

The consequences to the makeup of the Supreme Court of a Democrat success in November are almost unimaginable. If someone could create a list of Republicans who WOULD win in November, I would gladly support one of them over Trump, Cruz, or Kasich if I knew none of those three could win.

91 posted on 04/13/2016 3:25:55 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell
It could very well be that a better approach to this election is to identify that Republican candidate who is least objectionable to the Republicans in order to garner the majority of independents.

How do you do that while retaining the loyalty of Cruz and Trump supporters, who constitute the vast majority of Republicans who have voted in the primaries?

You can't, so forget it. I will vote for any mangy mutt the GOPe nominates, even if it's not Cruz or Trump. But don't mistake that grudging effort for an endorsement. If the GOPe cheats the voters at the convention their chosen chump will lose the general election, barring some absolutely unprecedented bungling by Hillary or Bernie.

126 posted on 04/13/2016 3:47:45 PM PDT by MaxFlint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson