Is this another caucus to send a delegate to another caucus who selects a delegate to attend a convention so that delegates can be chosen by party bigwigs?
Yes, these were standing rules made several years ago, and quite public, so public that any candidate’s team members could have prepped to research it, understood it and addressed it, going back months.
Yes. Kim Jung Un, Castro and Putin are so jealous of the America primary. America yells “have fair elections” to those three while America cheats and destroys the process.
You got it. In some instances it doesn’t matter whether or not the anti-GOPe candidate wins a plurality or a majority of the vote in the precinct. because the GOPe PCO is an automatic delegate to the county, legislative district, or other convention; and the other delegates are often not formally elected, but volunteer instead and then are deemed to be elected. This sometimes results in the candidate with the most actual votes being frozen out of any or only a token delegate to represent that candidate at the convention. By the time the delegates meet at the county or other convention, the candidate with the most votes has too few delegates at the convention to prevent the GOPe delegates from voting them out of the election for the State convention. At the State Convention the delegates have already been so heavily stacked against the candidate who received the most votes at the precinct caucus, they have little or no hope of receiving enough votes to be elected for the National Convention. The whole affair begins with vote rigging and a stacked deck with the automatic delegates outweighing the actual voters, and the end result is a minority gaining control of the upstream delegates in defiance of the original popular vote at the first level precinct caucus. Then the GOPe wants to pretend it was all done fairly and by the rules as a minority overrules the plurality and/or the majority.
Depends on the allocation of the representation allocated per delegate for those who are representing as opposed to those who are only strawing multiplied by the superdelegate factor, minus the degradation factor times income produced per contrary neverdelegate donor. See?
Yup. Just like Hawaii and Utah. Still whining?