Then you obviously didn't read his informative post on Trump going back decades that pretty much debunks the enemedia's and your narrative of Trump.
So, You are telling us you feel more comfortable with the corrupt establishment and enemedia's narrative of Trump?
That's fine, ignore the truth, it's so easy to see how the establishment and enemedia always manages to deceive us in picking our candidates.
Some of us have wised up to their corruption but continue on with their distortions and spreading their deceptions.
CGato
BTW - to “debunk” something means to prove it never was said or occurred. That’s simply not true, here. It’s easy to see where Trump has made statements in opposition to each other over time. They have been made to favor the political climate and winds of the time. That is precisely why I referred to him (completely accurately) as a weathervane.